Thanks Ram for the response. Got it.
I did not think of a scenario having two peers for the cluster.

Regards,
Ashish

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:00 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I checked the code. I think the ScopeWalEditFilter is something where for
> the source cluster you set the scope of that Edit. There you can mention
> that is is for Global Replication.
>
> Now if you have two peers for the cluster and one of the peers you have
> specifically asked not to accept edits of a column family then such Edit
> can be ignored.  Did you see addPeers() API that takes a param that
> represnts a table with Cf list which says what column family's edit can be
> accepted?
>
> Makes sense?  Am I missing something here?
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ashish Singhi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ted.
> > Thanks for the response.
> >
> > I was talking about WAL edit replication. I guess that is different from
> > region replica replication, no ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ashish
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Please take a look at getScopeWALEntryFilter()
> > > in RegionReplicaReplicationEndpoint.java
> > >
> > > You can examine git log of the above file to see related JIRAs.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:49 AM, ashish singhi <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello All.
> > > >
> > > > By default we are adding both ScopeWALEntryFilter and
> > > > TableCfWALEntryFilter filter to the list of filters (as part of
> > > > BaseReplicationEndpoint#getWALEntryfilter) to filter out the WAL
> > entries
> > > > that needs to be replicated.
> > > > Here I am not able to find out the importance of having
> > > > TableCfWALEntryFilter over ScopeWALEntryFilter.
> > > > According to me all the entries which needs to be replicated are
> > already
> > > > filtered out from ScopeWALEntryFilter. So I do not see any advantage
> of
> > > > having TableCfWALEntryFilter.
> > > > Please let me know If I am missing something.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ashish Singhi
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to