In the end my company supports both Accumulo and HBase so it doesn't matter to me, but these are things I would consider
- I would think security should no longer be a factor. - Also be very careful when looking at benchmarks for I have found that some are bais ether way. If you want to do a real compare on performance I would get an export in both system and give them the same use case, same hard ware, and let them prove it out. - In my travels I have seen many HBase applications for the Banking, Gaming, Health, and many more industries. Other then the Gov, I only know of like 2 companies that use Accumulo for Isolated use cases. - In terms of active community Accumulo had 18 commits in the last month well HBase had about 130 - HBase will have full Spark, SparkStreaming, and Spark SQL integration in core very soon - Also Accumulo remember, it isn't just HBase vs Accumulo. Some times Accumulo is used in cases where HDFS and SolR would had been a better fit. So make sure you have an export review the use case and determine if you do really need a NoSql solution. Ted Malaska On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jerry He <jerry...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, folks > > We have people that are evaluating HBase vs Accumulo. > Security is an important factor. > > But I think after the Cell security was added in HBase, there is no more > real gap compared to Accumulo. > > I know we have both HBase and Accumulo experts on this list. > Could someone shred more light? > I am looking for real gap comparing HBase to Accumulo if there is any so > that I can be prepared to address them. This is not limited to the security > area. > > There are differences in some features and implementations. But they don't > see like real 'gaps'. > > Any comments and feedbacks are welcome. > > Thanks, > > Jerry >
