Ahh, thanks, gentlemen.
Andrew Purtell wrote:
Yeah, let's finish that.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ted Yu<yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14172
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
In looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14800, I saw
that the current libthrift dependency on master was at 0.9.2, but the
generated code still has the 0.9.0 comments.
Is there a reason for that? Should the libthrift version defined in the
poms be the de-facto version used by that version of HBase?
Thanks.
- Josh
