Sorry I meant RC for another (patch) release. Enis
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > We can't do another RC because there's already been a release, but I have a > patch release in the works. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Elliott, > > > > I was trying to understand how come the patch for HBASE-14689 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14689> was causing an issue > > in > > 1.1, but not in 0.98. I was not able to reproduce the condition. It looks > > to be a deadlock condition caused by un-ordered acquisition of row locks > ( > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14689?focusedCommentId=15010417&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15010417 > > ). > > > > Andrew, also in 0.98, we do not have any guarantee for the lock order in > > doMiniBatchMutation(), so I think it is safest to roll another RC > although > > we cannot reproduce the deadlock. > > > > Enis > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > This makes me nervous so I am going to make a patch release that is the > > > 0.98.16 change set plus this one revert. Let me do that today. > Appreciate > > > it if we can get a quick turn around on voting. I'll aim for 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2015, at 8:47 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Andrew, > > > > > > > > Maybe we can hold off the release announcement at least, and wait > until > > > we > > > > investigate further. I'll look at the batching and how row locks are > > > > different between 0.98 and branch-1 tomorrow. > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks Enis. Appreciate the investigation. > > > >> > > > >> Yes I did release this. We can make a patch release though if > needed. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 8:04 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> I have tried the same pe command without small values, and cannot > > > >> reproduce > > > >>> the row lock issue in this RC. > > > >>> > > > >>> Setup is single node with default settings, using a single SSD. > > > >>> > > > >>> bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 randomWrite 10 > > > >>> This same exact command, I can reproduce the hang in 1.0.3RC and > > > 1.1.3RC. > > > >>> > > > >>> Enis > > > >>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Enis Söztutar < > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Andrew did you push the artifacts yet? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Let me see whether this RC is also affected by > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14689 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Enis > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> With three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes and we > > > have > > > >>>>> 0.98.16. I will send the artifacts onward for distribution and > send > > > >> out a > > > >>>>> release announcement shortly. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks to all who voted on this candidate. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > > [email protected]> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.16 release candidate (RC0) is available for > > > >> download > > > >>>>> at > > > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.16RC0/ and Maven > > artifacts > > > >> are > > > >>>>>> also available in the temporary repository > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1118/ > > > >>>>> . > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> This release does not contain a doc update. Usually I copy back > > docs > > > >>>>> from > > > >>>>>> master. This time I encountered a build error, reported on > > > >> HBASE-14792. > > > >>>>>> This isn't a critical (or even major) issue for any given > release > > > >> since > > > >>>>> doc > > > >>>>>> updates for 0.98 are rare now, but should be fixed for the next > > > >> release. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous > release > > > can > > > >> be > > > >>>>>> found at > > > >> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.15_0.98.16RC0_compat_report.html > > > >>>>> . > > > >>>>>> There are no reported binary or source compatibility issues with > > > >>>>>> user facing public or LimitedPrivate interfaces. Users should > not > > be > > > >>>>>> implementing the HConnection interface so will not be impacted > by > > > the > > > >>>>>> addition of a new abstract method. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> The 47 issues resolved in this release can be found at > > > >>>>>> http://s.apache.org/Xbv . > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be > > > open > > > >>>>> for > > > >>>>>> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it > Monday > > > >>>>> October > > > >>>>>> 16, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC > will > > > be > > > >>>>>> required to release. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Best regards, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> - Andy > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > Piet > > > >> Hein > > > >>>>> (via Tom White) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
