Unable to find it. Feel free to open. JMS
2015-12-31 12:36 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>: > I think there is one. I will search later today... > Le 2015-12-31 11:35 AM, "Ted Yu" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> A brief search turned up no hit. >> >> Please go ahead with new JIRA. >> >> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:32 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Cool :) >> > Is there a jira already? Otherwise I'll file one. >> > -- Lars >> > >> > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> >> > To: dev <[email protected]> >> > Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:10 AM >> > Subject: Re: Compact after manual flush broken in 1.0+? >> > >> > Indeed. I already informed the list about that months ago ;) >> > >> > 2015-12-31 9:09 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > bq. it looks like this is an oversight >> > > >> > > I agree. >> > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:04 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Normally HBase triggers a compaction after a manual flush (of a >> region >> > or >> > > > table). >> > > > Looks like in 1.0 and later the code is still there but not actually >> > > > exercised, because FlushTableSubprocedure calls Region.flush() >> directly >> > > and >> > > > ignores the return code. >> > > > >> > > > Was that by design? If so, we can remove the flushResult logic. But >> it >> > > > looks like this is an oversight and we want to trigger the >> compaction >> > > still. >> > > > Comments? >> > > > -- Lars >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >
