I see.

The release tags I pushed are not signed.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:

> To date the only signing has been on release tags. AFAIK, signed tags are
> only visible using "git show":
>
> ex:
>
> $ git show 1.0.0
> tag 1.0.0
> Tagger: Enis Soztutar <[email protected]>
> Date:   Sat Feb 21 14:32:18 2015 -0800
>
> Tag 1.0.0
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAABCgAGBQJU6Qd4AAoJEAhFjDnpZLX/TvkP/2qrbuvm2Fp7ifrhZ5pngApl
> plrI6yWUaXIS9cFj3fvInoXZ7CvKGSs6+ixngRsQBoYHvH1Lgu8SGcPVn5wj54WJ
> bnwnhlvsfp3NQ1/UuADqCYPb8xRkHdijMnCxeRyZPGR3piZSCN8MwTSsdKbIJU8u
> XCyDgFVx3IEOpphCDytZu5gZ6pRnvJfm3SqAjXC86/h8eTRvMwdbV1SwePWNA5HQ
> CMHUBkLm4Nw8xD0Z7AdsKb+GxeM2P/xtN+ETQI0mOXJ9aWfsDQaGsMi4DXQRBGeT
> h3Q/r6lImOjBqAnMeny3JLy3OIpDhFk7ezm2L7zwzaCgCGjWOcN/G7mmJkkl/i18
> 0MKKij7CPDP3yKfkhZs1HW68FalIaJ/kTQsRHIFOR+leVrB4xnaa2bx42lkWouqC
> 329qtubrGYN8jzqHSjoV5GvlAxz4tWdKz97N+WaBouzrQNkfAwkW9Kr/Cgr8XxQG
> h+CxPJN8NEWdQKzEK6ibeGjCp8ULKfhuPUtIq3U/9vnFs4gtt0I6AQo5VeWxpePu
> 7BO1utwlWSQExMb5ES7fbwabh26yd9ZIfELpx7Ek3HR9jCEu7rE0pneKHUEFGR0d
> +hXlYua9wcKmcftu4Q1nnz+tFFtCv9uosxWRMFHN/0RAw67rQ2D/hqS4vpnNsOQF
> rjvbLk7ASDRbjD15WxXj
> =ef23
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> commit 6c98bff7b719efdb16f71606f3b7d8229445eb81
> Author: Enis Soztutar <[email protected]>
> Date:   Sat Feb 14 19:41:51 2015 -0800
>
> ....SNIP...
>
> $  git show 1.1.2
> tag 1.1.2
> Tagger: Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>
> Date:   Tue Sep 1 09:15:22 2015 -0700
>
> Tag 1.1.2
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIcBAABCgAGBQJV5c8aAAoJEK2QOQccNIm9wjUQAIcZLsjYEKVohQJq5Wp3ZcrD
> Z8dN265BIG1/IyBvvVYDEKQljWXeb5sIYxjoE0jVkiC80IWKmRKVgmR1K+lElPyR
> Jx39ea+tNUKfrVj+vGN+3xOlLsc2RT+9x9EhKL+X38ZUUD7P0bSlcQvCekYFc0Ik
> 61VZDF24VXL4dvudahpOf+1mfQam9Ij4bEtwSe7tK8BSd1+FaPQKatEK5UqUAf+d
> TTi3dnsoyZKOgiaSesZ6QbocBhB7h68ormnY9dowkCdr6CK/qXuNlCYNqtJx3EKQ
> a0UsqbQNLimGANtO1llU8DiTbcS113z0SEiFyn4b/MuM8VtUQgMiLJx44o0ZhUB9
> GDzXXMdMM7xkJjc7mUT5kxyqwsAo+G5MtaAS2gkMeeF4l5sZ+xT+DUKWfwfVBe0D
> cg4JhhbX6/O4Nis92CQTbVLfgtF/K20cph5J7JiIf7wT+vkF2sIpb04INMCF/c+D
> P5XGQt8UJ+Lewiln2E56UOOjRKZdj2JXBEOkiXXFledoXuGsBHWLUi0vL6FmmsZN
> nd27SSsA/4cJerV4N91ekeqJ343oc6SYYuevfiTa6TIB2I9qRn7bLBFMedlzLSvt
> 0sKUgZvK3oDtOJ0N3gk+TkvXiHSBZQIpWw9H4hUXh+Vx5C+0FD+sGMSGea+md+b+
> YHyDoviUo72QtexwuS5c
> =I+Z4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ...SNIP...
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I have made new refs in rel/ pointing to the same SHA as the earlier tag
> > and pushed them.
> >
> > I don't believe any committers have or are planning to make PGP signed
> > commits. I also made a quick check with 'git log' of recent release refs
> > and did not find signed commits. That is a practice we could adopt. I'd
> be
> > supportive of that. All committers would need to do so to make it
> > worthwhile.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > one question: will the new historic tags have your PGP signature rather
> > > than the original RM(s)? If so, do we need to make a note of the cause
> of
> > > this discrepancy?
> > >
> > > A vote in favor of leaving the old tags: since we've been treating
> > release
> > > tags as permalinks (regardless of their actual mutable state), folks
> are
> > > likely to have links to them saved places.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Question: Would you like me to clean up afterward by pushing deletes
> > for
> > > > the soon-to-be duplicate release tags? No rush on an answer. I'll
> wait
> > a
> > > > few days for responses to come in.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'll be adding tags under refs/rel/ for all previous HBase releases
> > > > today,
> > > > > using a snapshot of HBase's Apache git repository last updated at
> > > Monday
> > > > > January 25 13:20:47 PST 2016.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >    - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Reply via email to