-1 The dataloss issue was just discovered. I think now we know of it, even though the incidence is rare, would be best to respin the RC.
You the man Sean, St.Ack On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Feb 11, 2016 18:33, "张铎" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Should we include HBASE-15252? It is a data loss issue. >> > >> >> It's marked major (though perhaps that's off since it's dataloss, even if >> rare). More importantly it's been present in prior releases for some time. >> >> Blocking 1.2.0 would put pressure on getting a solution faster, I think. >> Additionally, letting the fix wait for 1.2.1 will give me a good incentive >> to keep the path releases on schedule. ;) >> >> My 2¢. Happy to roll another RC if folks see it otherwise. >> > > Dataloss. I think we should roll a new RC with short voting timeframe. > St.Ack > >
