(Doing another resend...) I have objection to you, Ted Yu, doing it. MOB has spread all about master branch. Backport should be done by someone who knows MOB.
Higher up in this thread, Sean asks: "Can we get a [DISCUSS] flagged thread to see what, if anything, folks would like to see gate inclusion in branch-1?" Shouldn't we do this before we 'create a backport...'. For me, there should be no new flakies in branch-1. Branch-1 builds are a hard-won stable(-ish). Looking at master build, MOB seems quiet lately but going by HBASE-15012, our flakies umbrella issue, I see notes that TestMobExportSnapshot has failed a few times (that is probably because the test it derives from is flakey) and TestMobRestoreFlushSnapshotFromClient gets a mention. St.Ack On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > (Doing a resend of below... it doesn't seem to have gone through) > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If there is no objection, I will create a backport JIRA tomorrow and >> attach patch. >> >> > I have objection to you doing it. MOB has spread all about master branch. > Backport should be done by someone who knows MOB. > > Higher up in this thread, Sean asks: "Can we get a [DISCUSS] flagged > thread to see what, if anything, folks > would like to see gate inclusion in branch-1?" Shouldn't we do this > before we 'create a backport...'. > > For me, there should be no new flakies in branch-1. Branch-1 builds are a > hard-won stable(-ish). Looking at master build, MOB seems quiet lately but > going by HBASE-15012, our flakies umbrella issue, I see notes that > TestMobExportSnapshot has failed a few times (that is probably because the > test it derives from is flakey) and TestMobRestoreFlushSnapshotFromClient > gets a mention. > > St.Ack > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> If there is no objection, I will create a backport JIRA tomorrow and >>> attach patch. >>> >>> >> I have objection to you doing it. MOB has spread all about master branch. >> Backport should be done by someone who knows MOB. >> >> Higher up in this thread, Sean asks: "Can we get a [DISCUSS] flagged >> thread to see what, if anything, folks >> would like to see gate inclusion in branch-1?" Shouldn't we do this >> before we 'create a backport...'. >> >> For me, there should be no new flakies in branch-1. Branch-1 builds are a >> hard-won stable(-ish). Looking at master build, MOB seems quiet lately but >> going by HBASE-15012, our flakies umbrella issue, I see notes that >> TestMobExportSnapshot has failed a few times (that is probably because the >> test it derives from is flakey) and TestMobRestoreFlushSnapshotFromClient >> gets a mention. >> >> St.Ack >> >
