> performance tests focused on the impact of the feature on those who don't 
>want it.
Andy and Ted, Given that this code does not touch the write path or the read 
path at all it would seem practical to skip read/write perf tests (ie YCSB, PE, 
etc)?
> where the result will go into someone's production.
Are we being more stringent with 0.98 because it is expected to be more stable 
than a 1.x release?


    On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:11 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
 

 bq.  same things I asked for MOB: Functional, stability, and performance
tests focused on the impact of the feature on those who don't want it.

+1 on the above.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
wrote:

> I would like to see the same things I asked for MOB: Functional, stability,
> and performance tests focused on the impact of the feature on those who
> don't want it. Can use the usual suspects: PE, LTT, YCSB, our ITs. Given
> how 6721 has been implemented I suspect favorable results will be easy to
> obtain.
>
> I think we would like to see a backport to branch-1 because we will be
> bringing our production up to a 1.x soon.
>
> Its fair to consider a backport to 0.98 but as RM for that branch I'd like
> to see it go into branch-1 first and also have a case where the result will
> go into someone's production.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Francis Liu <tof...@ymail.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > HBASE-6721 is now committed to trunk. It'd be great if it can be
> > backported to 1.x and 0.98 so that we can use it internally as well as
> push
> > up features and fixes. We have been running an internal version for
> around
> > 4 years. There's seems to be interest (HW, Bloomberg, Salesforce, etc).
> > Also given how modular the code is. There's barely any effect in existing
> > code paths.
> > Seeding the criteria with Andy's suggestions in jira:
> > 1. Stability - Unit tests and ?2. functional3. Performance - Read/write
> > path was not affected. Some small changes related to assignment.
> > Thanks,
> > Francis
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>


  

Reply via email to