Maybe it's worth spelling out? It will become more obvious once 0.98 is retired. I think of them like this:
0.98.x -- legacy 1.x -- current Within current, we have 1.0.x -- retired/EOL 1.1.x -- maintenance 1.2.x -- stable 1.3.x -- unstable In time, 1.1 will also retire/EOL, 1.2 will become maintenance, and so on. On Friday, July 22, 2016, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > In our last board report we mentioned the several code lines we current > manage and were asked to consider some form of support policy so the > community is able to make informed decisions about which release line to > use. > > The first question is: should we have one? > > The second question, if the answer to the first is 'yes', is what that > policy should be. > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
