Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16426 to take care of this. Thanks, all.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see the committer affiliation information as useful to the project > except perhaps as indirect Powered-by marketing. That's actually had if > comically out of date. It's certainly not useful or operative for project > governance. > > > On Jun 22, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It is on each individual committer to keep that up to date. But as people > > move on, and stop being active more, it is easily forgotten. I am fine > with > > removing the affiliates since the usability is questionable. > > > > Enis > > > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Misty Stanley-Jones > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> As a matter of policy, is it worth discussing the policy of listing > >>> individual company affiliations in this context, since they often go > out > >> of > >>> date? I think I understand (politically) why we list them, but it does > >> seem > >>> like a weak point from a maintenance and accuracy point of view. > >> > >> The impression I get from the current ASF Board is that they'd love it > >> if we didn't list them at all. I don't have a strong personal > >> attachment to publicly declaring the sponsor of my non-ASF-hat; I'm > >> sure folks can find me on LinkedIn. > >> >
