Hi all After cutting branch-2, what will we do for branch-1? If I am not wrong, 1.4 may be the last 1.x release branch? Should 1.4.0 release before 2.0.0? If not, will it confuse users?
Thanks, Phil 2017-01-01 5:20 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>: > On the other hand branching will force the issue. There will always be > lists of issues to get in. How long have we been talking about 2.0? At > least a year and a half. At some point it's time to stop talking and take > action. Let me revisit progress at the end of January and bring this up > again. As a member of the PMC I'm advising all concerned that 2.0 is > talking too long and I am considering steps to move it forward. > > > > On Dec 31, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I agree with Stephen on not branching too early. > > > > When people come back from vacation, we can poll relevant parties on > > estimate of respective project to get a sense of when would be proper > time > > for branching. > > > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiang...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Hello, Andrew, I was a helper on Matteo so that we can help each other > >> while we are focusing on the new Assignment Manager work. Now he is not > >> available (at least in the next few months). I have to be more focused > on > >> the new AM work; plus other work in my company; it would be too much > for me > >> to 2.0 RM alone. I am happy someone would help to take primary 2.0 RM > role > >> while I am still help to make this 2.0 release smooth. > >> > >> For branch-2, I think it is too early to cut it, as we still have a lot > of > >> moving parts and on-going project that needs to be part of 2.0. For > >> example, the mentioned new AM (and other projects, such as HBASE-14414, > >> HBASE-15179, HBASE-14070, HBASE-14850, HBASE-16833, HBASE-15531, just > name > >> a few). Cutting branch now would add burden to complete those projects. > >> > >> thanks > >> Stephen > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Andrew Purtell < > andrew.purt...@gmail.com > >>> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I've heard a rumor the co-RM situation with 2.0 may have changed. Can > we > >>> get an update from co-RMs Matteo and Steven on their availability and > >>> interest in continuing in this role? > >>> > >>> To assist in moving 2.0 forward I intend to branch branch-2 from master > >>> next week. Unless there is an objection I will take this action under > >>> assumption of lazy consensus. Master branch will be renumbered to > >>> 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT. Once we have a branch-2 I will immediately begin scale > >>> tests and stabilization (via bug fixes or reverts of unfinished work) > and > >>> invite interested collaborators to do the same. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> >
