+1 to EOL. Thanks Andrew for all the great RM work! Won't forget the days 0.98 accompanied us in production (smile).
Best Regards, Yu On 11 April 2017 at 03:42, Gary Helmling <ghelml...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to EOL, and thanks to Andrew for all of the RM'ing. > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Andrew has done tremendous work. > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 to EOL 0.98. > > > > > > Thanks Andrew for all the work maintaining it! > > > > > > -Mikhail > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Dima Spivak <dimaspi...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > -Dima > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I agree we should EOL 0.98. > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > apurt...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of > > responses > > > > as > > > > > > indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL. > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe we should declare 0.98 EOL. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Folks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Back in January our Andrew Purtell stepped down as the release > > > > > > > manager for the 0.98 release line. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the resultant dev@hbase thread[1] folks seemed largely in > > favor > > > > of > > > > > > > declaring end-of-maintenance for the 0.98 line. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that it's been a couple of months, does anyone have > concerns > > > > about > > > > > > > pushing forward on that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do folks who listen on user@hbase but not dev@hbase have any > > > > concerns? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As with any end-of-maintenance branch, the PMC would consider > on > > a > > > > > > > case-by-case basis doing a future release of the branch should > a > > > > > > > critical security vulnerability show up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/DjCi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -busbey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - > > > Raymond > > > > > > Teller (via Peter Watts) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Michael Antonov > > > > > >
