Done ;)

There were two issues still tagged as alpha-1 (JIRA didn't want to show me them before performing the action), but I bumped them to alpha-2.

On 6/20/17 12:19 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
Hi Stack,

Can you mark jira version 2.0.0-alpha-1 as released?

Thanks,
Mike

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

With 4 binding votes and 1 non-binding, vote passes. Let me push out the
alpha.
Thanks to all who voted.
St.Ack


On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

Great. Thanks Sean. In-line...

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote:

+1

details below, a few things to clean up for later alpha/betas.

* checksums are all good
* signatures are made with two different keys. should clean up by next
alpha.

src / bin artifacts are signed with 8ACC93D2, as you mentioned in the
VOTE. However, this key is not in our project's KEYS file.


Yes. Will fix.


maven staged repository are signed with 30CD0996, which is in our KEYS
file so those check out fine.

* the tag 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0 does point to
c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc, which matches the source
artifact after accounting HBASE-13088

The tag isn't signed; would be good to make sure we do tag signing in
betas so that it's ready to go come GA time.


Next time through, I'll update our 'How to RC' doc and will add above.



(side note, it would be good to get a decision on HBASE-13088 for the
beta releases. been over 2 years)

* the source tarball creates a binary assembly that looks as close to
the posted binary artifact as I've seen branch-1 do.

idle interest, but our binary convenience artifact has jumped from
~100MiB in branch-1 release to ~160MiB. If anyone has time to dig in
on why, probably worth checking. (e.g. the docs directory is ~585 MiB
when untared.)


Yes. Its obnoxious (HBASE-18208).


* shaded artifact binaries are a reasonable number of MiB in size
(incorrect build flags will result in ~empty jars)

* LICENSE/NOTICE spot check looks okay.

we have a ton of places where we have velocity variables instead of
copyright years, but IIRC that's a problem on branch-1 right now too.

* CHANGES file hasn't been updated correctly

currently has details for 0.93.


Will fix next time through.

Thanks Sean,
S



On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
wrote:
+1

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-alpha-1 is up at:

  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
alpha-1RC0/

Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:

  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
hbase-1169

All was signed w/ my key 8ACC93D2
<http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2>

I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0
(c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc).

hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1 will be our first 2.0.0 release. It is a rough
cut
('alpha') not-for-production preview of what hbase-2.0.0 will look
like. It
is what we used to call a 'Developer' release[1] meant mostly for
devs
and
downstreamers to test drive and flag us early if we there are issues
we’ve
missed ahead of our rolling a production-worthy release.

hbase-2.0.0 includes a fleet of new features that include a new
assignment
manager, means for keeping read and write path off-heap, in-memory
compactions, and more. I have been keeping a running doc on the state
of
2.0.0 here [2]. There is much to do still (see aforementioned doc).

The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [4].
There
are about 2500. The list of ~500 fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be
found
here [3].

Please take it for a spin and vote on whether it ok to put out as our
first
alpha (bar is low for an 'alpha'). Let the VOTE be open for 24 hours.

Thanks,
St.Ack

1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning.pre10
2.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_
ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#heading=h.v21r9nz8g01j
3.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17852?jql=
project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.
0.0%20and%20fixVersion%20not%20in%20(1.0.0%2C%201.0.1%2C%
201.0.2%2C%201.0.3%2C%201.0.4%2C%201.0.5%2C%201.0.6%2C%201.
1.0%2C%201.1.1%2C%201.1.2%2C%201.1.3%2C%201.1.4%2C%201.1.5%
2C%201.1.6%2C%201.1.7%2C%201.1.8%2C%201.1.9%2C%201.1.10%2C%
201.2.0%2C%201.2.1%2C%201.2.2%2C%201.2.3%2C%201.2.4%2C%201.
2.5%2C%201.2.6%2C%201.3.0%2C%201.3.1%2C%201.4.0)%20and%20%
20(status%20%3D%20Open%20or%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%
20Available%22)
4.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18191?jql=
project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20(%20fixVersion%20%3D%
202.0.0)%20and%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved)




--
Best regards,

    - Andy

If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. -
Raymond
Teller (via Peter Watts)





Reply via email to