> Can you explain please how did you guys manage to file multiple JIRAs
(trivials mostly) without testing backup/restore?

What the fuck, Vlad.

Obviously we did some testing.

You said "Salesforce team has conducted independent testing and found no
issues with a functionality to my best knowledge."

That's not true, we found issues and filed JIRAs. As to how significant
they are or not, I defer to the JIRAs for discussion.


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Vladimir Rodionov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> >>I dont' want to get drawn into another unfriendly argument, but this is
> >>simply not true. We filed a bunch of JIRAs including one with serious
> >>concerns about scalability.
>
> Can you explain please how did you guys manage to file multiple JIRAs
> (trivials mostly)
> without testing backup/restore?
>
> What you are referring to is not a scalability (its scalable), but
> *possible* performance issue of incremental backup
> We have JIRA and partial patch to address this issue HBASE-17825. This will
> definitely make it into beta-1.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/1/17 1:32 PM, Stack wrote:
> > >
> > >> I want to purge the below list of modules, features, and abandoned
> code
> > >> from branch-2 before we make a beta-1 (4-5 weeks I'm thinking). Lets
> > >> discuss. Some are already scheduled for removal but listing anyways
> for
> > >> completeness sake. Pushback or other suggestions on what else we
> should
> > >> remove are welcome.
> > >>
> > >> Distributed Log Replay: Just last week, I heard of someone scheduling
> > >> testing of DLR. We need to better message that this never worked and
> > >> was/is
> > >> not supported. It's a good idea that we should implement but built on
> a
> > >> different chasis (procedurev2?). Meantime, DLR is still scattered
> about
> > >> the
> > >> codebase as an optional code path. Lets remove it.
> > >>
> > >> hbase-native-client: It is not done and won't be for 2.0.0. It can
> come
> > in
> > >> later when it is done (2.1 or 3.0).
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think that's fine. It's in a state where people can use it to do
> basic
> > > read-write operations. While it would be nice to have this go out to
> > folks
> > > who would test it, forcing that to happen via inclusion in a release
> > isn't
> > > necessary.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Grand.
> >
> >
> >
> > > hbase-prefix-tree: A visionary effort that unfortunately has had no
> > uptake
> > >> since its original wizard-author moved on. I don't believe it is used
> > >> anywhere. It has become a drag as global changes need to be applied in
> > >> here
> > >> too by folks who are not up on how it works probably doing damage
> along
> > >> the
> > >> way. This is like DLR in it should be first class but we've not done
> the
> > >> work to keep it up.
> > >>
> > >> hbase-backup: Not done and it doesn't look like it will be done for
> > >> beta-1.
> > >> It can come in later in a 2.1 or 3.0 when it is finished.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ditto to what Vlad said. AFAIK, just the one issue remains:
> HBASE-17852.
> > > Didn't want to bother you with it while you were head-down on alpha4,
> > > Stack; can you take a look at the explanation Vlad has put up there so
> we
> > > can try to move it forward? I don't think this needs to be punted out.
> > >
> > >
> > I'll take a look sir.
> >
> >
> >
> > > hbase-spark: Purging this makes me tear-up.
> > >>
> > >
> > > We had a talk about this a while back, didn't we? I forget if we had
> > > consensus about having it follow its own release schedule (rather than
> > > tying it to HBase "internals") -- I think I suggested that anyways :P.
> > >
> > >
> > Sean filed HBASE-18817 <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/HBASE-18817>
> > with
> > the result of that discussion.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Now that I'm thinking about it, I wonder if that's actually the proper
> > > route forward for hbase-native-client too...
> > >
> > >
> > And backup?
> >
> > Thanks Josh.
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > What else?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> St.Ack
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,
Andrew

Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
   - A23, Crosstalk

Reply via email to