On 11/28/17 4:54 PM, Stack wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
Wanted to get some input on the versioning scheme for our hbase-thirdparty
artifacts.
We are moving all of the relocation from o.a.h.shaded to o.a.h.thirdparty
due to conflicts with our non-thirdparty shaded libraries. Currently, the
next release is slated to be of the thirdparty libs is slated to be 1.0.2,
however the package change seems like a big deal.
I propose that we go to 1.1.0 or 2.0.0 even with this. Version numbers are
cheap, we won't run out, so we can afford to be aggressive with
incrementing them. And we don't have to worry about other users of this,
since it's all designed to be internal.
Thoughts?
2.0.0
+1
