Not too late, no On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Fix is up if it is not too late Andrew. > St.Ack > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > Andrew, your testing has turned up an issue in HBASE-18233. It is present > > in the 1.4 candidate patch and in 1.3. The failure is intermittent. I am > > working on a fix but want to make sure I have it right. So, I withdraw my > > request that 1.4 include it. > > > > Thanks, > > S > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> TestGlobalThrottler is a problem stemming from the revert of HBASE-9465 > >> on branch-1.4. The test came in on HBASE-17314 so I'll also revert > that > >> from branch-1.4. For more on this see HBASE-19381 > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > The TestEndToEndSplitTransaction failure will be fixed by HBASE-19379. > >> > > >> > The TestGlobalThrottler issue is a hang, which is probably why it > >> slipped > >> > through the cracks. I went back 32 commits from head and it was still > >> > stuck. 64 commits back it's good. Somewhere in between. Will get to > the > >> > offending commit shortly. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thanks. I'll take a look. They were passing for me before I went out > on > >> >> vacation. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Thanks. > >> >>> > >> >>> BTW, I noticed this morning that TestGlobalThrottler and > >> >>> TestEndToEndSplitTransaction > >> >>> fail locally for me and up on jenkins as part of hadoopqa runs and > on > >> >>> recent 1.4 runs. > >> >>> > >> >>> I tried to poke at why. They seem fine in 1.2, 1.3, and 2.0. Got > >> >>> distracted > >> >>> and got no further than this.... > >> >>> > >> >>> S > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > Ok, no problem. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > May I get HBASE-18233 into 1.4.0 Andrew? It is in 1.2 and 1.3. > >> >>> Waiting on > >> >>> > > hadoopqa run. Would be good to have it all up and down branch-1. > >> >>> > > Thanks Sir, > >> >>> > > St.Ack > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Peter Somogyi < > >> >>> psomo...@cloudera.com> > >> >>> > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > HBASE-19188 was just resolved. :) > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Andrew Purtell < > >> >>> apurt...@apache.org> > >> >>> > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > I come back to find HBASE-19188 is a blocker. :-/ > >> >>> > > > > Need to resolve it > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Sean Busbey < > >> bus...@apache.org > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > thanks for all the work as RM on this Andrew! > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Andrew Purtell > >> >>> > > > > > <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > > Everything is in and ready to go. I'm out next week for > >> the > >> >>> > > > > Thanksgiving > >> >>> > > > > > > holiday, but will be back first week in December. > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Here is what I anticipate: > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 4 > >> >>> > > > > > > - 1.4.0 RC0 binaries will be available. > >> >>> > > > > > > - Voting begins. > >> >>> > > > > > > - Preflight checks will include RAT check, release > >> >>> audits, > >> >>> > > and > >> >>> > > > 25 > >> >>> > > > > > > iterations of the unit test suite. > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 5 - 8 > >> >>> > > > > > > - 24 hours ITBLL > >> >>> > > > > > > - PE and YCSB on cluster perf comparison with 1.2 > >> >>> > > > > > > - PE and YCSB single server profiling with JFR, > >> >>> comparison > >> >>> > > with > >> >>> > > > > 1.2 > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 11 > >> >>> > > > > > > - Voting concludes > >> >>> > > > > > > - Release, or RC1 depending on testing outcome > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 18 > >> >>> > > > > > > - RC1 voting concludes and release, if we need a > RC1 > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > From now until the 1.4.0 release, please refrain from > >> >>> committing > >> >>> > > > > > > potentially destabilizing changes or changes to public > >> APIs > >> >>> to > >> >>> > > > > > branch-1.4. > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Purtell < > >> >>> > > > > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> On HBASE-19232 we discuss testing the shaded client > using > >> >>> YCSB, > >> >>> > so > >> >>> > > > > I'll > >> >>> > > > > > >> use it to sanity check the shaded client as well as > >> >>> complete a > >> >>> > > perf > >> >>> > > > > > >> comparison with 1.2. > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Purtell < > >> >>> > > > > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > >> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> I'll do a PE comparison between 1.4.0 and 1.3 and/or > >> 1.2. > >> >>> Maybe > >> >>> > > > YSCB > >> >>> > > > > > too > >> >>> > > > > > >>> if I have time. Good idea, thanks. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > On Nov 11, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Yu Li < > car...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Great to know, really good progress! > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > It seems we don't do performance comparison with > >> current > >> >>> > stable > >> >>> > > > > > release > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > when releasing the first RC of a new branch, but > >> should > >> >>> we do > >> >>> > > to > >> >>> > > > > > avoid > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > issues like HBASE-14460 (write performance > regression > >> >>> from > >> >>> > 0.98 > >> >>> > > > to > >> >>> > > > > > 1.1)? > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > This is a must-have for us to decide new version for > >> >>> product > >> >>> > > env > >> >>> > > > > > here, > >> >>> > > > > > >>> and > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > I wonder whether this applies for most users (please > >> >>> forgive > >> >>> > my > >> >>> > > > > > >>> ignorance > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > if there's any existing policy for this). Thanks. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > bq. Back when we first discussed branching for 1.4 > Yu > >> Li > >> >>> > asked > >> >>> > > > for > >> >>> > > > > > >>> this... > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Thanks for remembering this and keeping the promise > >> boss > >> >>> > > (smile). > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Best Regards, > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Yu > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> On 11 November 2017 at 03:30, Andrew Purtell < > >> >>> > > > apurt...@apache.org > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> The march to 1.4.0 is progressing. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> I've run the unit test suite on a C4 class AWS > >> instance > >> >>> 25 > >> >>> > > times > >> >>> > > > > and > >> >>> > > > > > >>> there > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> are no failures. This is ongoing. I'm aiming for > 100 > >> >>> runs. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Fix versions are now set up for constructing a > >> >>> reasonable > >> >>> > > change > >> >>> > > > > > log. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> With HBASE-19232 applied a build with release > audits > >> >>> enabled > >> >>> > > > will > >> >>> > > > > > pass. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> I backported error-prone support yesterday and will > >> now > >> >>> look > >> >>> > > at > >> >>> > > > > > >>> checkstyle > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> and error-prone analyses for important issues. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> I'll probably do HBASE-19238 before 1.4.0 goes out > so > >> >>> that > >> >>> > > neat > >> >>> > > > > > utility > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> will be available. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Back when we first discussed branching for 1.4 Yu > Li > >> >>> asked > >> >>> > for > >> >>> > > > > this: > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> One naive question here: from the book > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> <http://hbase.apache.org/book. > html#hbase.versioning > >> > > >> >>> we > >> >>> > will > >> >>> > > > add > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> functionality (in a backwards-compatible manner) > in > >> >>> minor > >> >>> > > > > versions, > >> >>> > > > > > >>> but > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> it > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> seems we don't have any one-line description on > the > >> >>> > > differences > >> >>> > > > > > (what > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> main functionalities have been added) between > >> >>> > > > > > branch-1.1/1.2/1.3/1.4 > >> >>> > > > > > >>> so > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> user could better decide which version to > >> >>> choose/upgrade. > >> >>> > > > Should > >> >>> > > > > we > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> add some explicit document on this? Or release > note > >> of > >> >>> the > >> >>> > > > first > >> >>> > > > > > >>> release > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> for each branch is enough? Thanks. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> and I still agree to do it. I'll write it up while > >> the > >> >>> RC is > >> >>> > > > under > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> evaluation. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> ITBLL and replication testing to be performed on a > >> small > >> >>> > > cluster > >> >>> > > > > > once > >> >>> > > > > > >>> we > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> have the RC binaries. > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Anything else? (Within reason...) > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> -- > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Best regards, > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Andrew > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, > meaning > >> >>> torn > >> >>> > from > >> >>> > > > > > truth's > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> decrepit hands > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> - A23, Crosstalk > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> -- > >> >>> > > > > > >> Best regards, > >> >>> > > > > > >> Andrew > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning > torn > >> >>> from > >> >>> > > > truth's > >> >>> > > > > > >> decrepit hands > >> >>> > > > > > >> - A23, Crosstalk > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > -- > >> >>> > > > > > > Best regards, > >> >>> > > > > > > Andrew > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning > torn > >> >>> from > >> >>> > > > truth's > >> >>> > > > > > > decrepit hands > >> >>> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > -- > >> >>> > > > > Best regards, > >> >>> > > > > Andrew > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn > from > >> >>> > truth's > >> >>> > > > > decrepit hands > >> >>> > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > Best regards, > >> >>> > Andrew > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > >> truth's > >> >>> > decrepit hands > >> >>> > - A23, Crosstalk > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Best regards, > >> >> Andrew > >> >> > >> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > truth's > >> >> decrepit hands > >> >> - A23, Crosstalk > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Best regards, > >> > Andrew > >> > > >> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > >> > decrepit hands > >> > - A23, Crosstalk > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Andrew > >> > >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > >> decrepit hands > >> - A23, Crosstalk > >> > > > > > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
