Thanks Josh. I've fixed the build so it at least compiles against Hadoop 3.0.0, and I think that is good enough. We do not need to claim anything better than that for branch-1.4 or branch-1 at this time.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 not release blockers > > This stems from this line of thinking: > > * Hadoop does not dictate HBase's release schedule (except in extenuating > circumstances) > * HBase can't ensure compatibility against something that does not yet > exist > > > On 12/4/17 3:43 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Does anyone view compilation problems against Hadoop 3.0.0 in branch-1 as >> a >> release blocker? See HBASE-19421. >> >> In my view >> , use of Hadoop 3 with branch-1 HBase is not something we are going to >> recommend for production use for some time, and Hadoop 3.0.0 is not even >> GA >> yet. (I know it may be close.) Therefore, builds that work with it are >> nice >> to have, but not essential. Compilation problems found for e.g. 1.4.0 can >> be fixed for subsequent release 1.4.1. >> >> Please speak up if you disagree. Let's discuss this before we have a RC >> vote where it may come up. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrew >> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >> decrepit hands >> - A23, Crosstalk >> >> -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
