I'm not super comfortable with that... If it has a spotty record like you suggest, then I don't want to be ironing out issues with it so close to beta/release. There's already enough to iron out and we're so close to the end that I don't want to risk destabilizing at this point...
Mike On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > There's been a request to enable region normalization by default. Sounds > reasonable to me. Any objections? I think normalization has spotted record > so far. Enabling it we can try and iron out and issues with it before we do > the hbase 2.0.0 RC. If not possible, can disable before RC. > > Thanks, > S > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (I thought I'd already posted a DISCUSSION on defaults for 2.0.0 but > can't > > find it...) > > > > Dear All: > > > > I'm trying to get some eyeballs/thoughts on changes you'd like seen in > > hbase defaults for hbase-2.0.0. We have a an ISSUE and some good > discussion > > already up at HBASE-19148. > > > > A good case is being made for enabling balancing by table as default. > > > > Guanghao Zhang has already put in place more sensible retry/timeout > > numbers. > > > > Anything else we should change? Shout here or up on the issue. > > > > Thanks, > > S > > > > > > >
