On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> I just vetoed the RC because TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always fails for > me. It was the same with the last RC too. My Java is Oracle Java 8u144 > running on x64 Linux (Ubuntu xenial). Let me know if you need me to provide > the test output. > > Ok. I can't make it fail. I'm going to disable it and file an issue where we can work on figuring what is different here. Thanks A, St.Ack > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > I put up a new RC JMS. It still has flakies (though Duo fixed > > TestFromClientSide...). Was thinking that we could release beta-1 though > it > > has flakies. We'll keep working on cutting these down as we approach GA. > > St.Ack > > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, thanks Stack. I will keep it running all day long until I get a > > >> successful one. Is that useful that I report all the failed? Or just a > > >> wast > > >> of time? Here is the last failed: > > >> > > >> [INFO] Results: > > >> [INFO] > > >> [ERROR] Failures: > > >> [ERROR] TestFromClientSide.testCheckAndDeleteWithCompareOp:4982 > > >> expected:<false> but was:<true> > > >> [ERROR] Errors: > > >> [ERROR] TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS.testThreeRSAbort:401 » > > >> TableNotFound Region ... > > >> [INFO] > > >> [ERROR] Tests run: 3585, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 44 > > >> [INFO] > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Thanks for bringing up flakies. If we look at the nightlies' run, we > can > > > get the current list. Probably no harm if all tests pass once in a > while > > > (smile). > > > > > > Looking at your findings, TestFromClientSide. > > testCheckAndDeleteWithCompareOp > > > looks to be new to beta-1. Its a cranky one. I'm looking at it. Might > > punt > > > to beta-2 if can't figure it by tomorrow. HBASE-19731. > > > > > > TestDLSAsyncFSWAL is a flakey that unfortunately passes locally. > > > > > > Let me see what others we have... > > > > > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> JMS > > >> > > >> 2018-01-07 1:55 GMT-05:00 Apekshit Sharma <a...@cloudera.com>: > > >> > > >> > bq. Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy? > > >> > Yeah we do...sigh. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > idk about that. But don't we need a *patch* branch branch-2.0 (just > > like > > >> > branch-1.4) where we "make backwards-compatible bug fixes" and a > > *minor* > > >> > branch branch-2 where we "add functionality in a > backwards-compatible > > >> > manner". > > >> > Quotes are from http://hbase.apache.org/book.h > > >> tml#hbase.versioning.post10. > > >> > I stumbled on this issue when thinking about backporting > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17436 for 2.1. > > >> > > > >> > -- Appy > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:11 PM, stack <saint....@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > It is not you. There are a bunch of flies we need to fix. This > > >> latter is > > >> > > for sure flakey. Let me take a look. Thanks, JMS. > > >> > > > > >> > > S > > >> > > > > >> > > On Jan 6, 2018 5:57 PM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" < > > >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > I might not doing the right magic to get that run.... If someone > is > > >> able > > >> > to > > >> > > get all the tests pass, can you please share the command you run? > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > >> > > JMS > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > [INFO] Results: > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [ERROR] Failures: > > >> > > [ERROR] TestFromClientSide.testCheckAndDeleteWithCompareOp:4982 > > >> > > expected:<false> but was:<true> > > >> > > [ERROR] > > >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.TestMergeTableRegi > > >> onsProcedure > > >> > > .testMergeRegionsConcurrently(org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > master.assig > > >> > > nment.TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.setup:111->resetProcExecutorT > > >> estingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > >> > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [ERROR] > > >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.TestMergeTableRegi > > >> onsProcedure > > >> > > .testMergeTwoRegions(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master. > assignment.Tes > > >> > > tMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.setup:111->resetProcExecutorT > > >> estingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > >> > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [ERROR] > > >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.TestMergeTableRegi > > >> onsProcedure > > >> > . > > >> > > testRecoveryAndDoubleExecution(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.ass > > >> > > ignment.TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.setup:111->resetProcExecutorT > > >> estingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > >> > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [ERROR] > > >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.TestMergeTableRegi > > >> onsProcedure > > >> > . > > >> > > testRollbackAndDoubleExecution(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.ass > > >> > > ignment.TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.testRollbackAndDoubleExecution:272 > > >> > > expected:<true> but was:<false> > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > >> > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > >> > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > >> > > ag:138 > > >> > > expected executor to be running > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [ERROR] TestSnapshotQuotaObserverChore.testSnapshotSize:276 > > Waiting > > >> > > timed > > >> > > out after [30 000] msec > > >> > > [ERROR] > > >> > > TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush>TestHRegion.testWritesWhileScan > > >> ning:3813 > > >> > > expected null, but was:<org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > > >> > NotServingRegionException: > > >> > > testWritesWhileScanning,,1515277468063.468265483817cb6da6320 > > >> 26ba5b306f6. > > >> > > is > > >> > > closing> > > >> > > [ERROR] Errors: > > >> > > [ERROR] TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS.testThreeRSAbort:401 > » > > >> > > TableNotFound testThr... > > >> > > [ERROR] > > >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer. > TestRegionsOnMasterOptions. > > >> > > testRegionsOnAllServers(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer. > > >> > > TestRegionsOnMasterOptions) > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > >> > > TestRegionsOnMasterOptions.testRegionsOnAllServers:94-> > > >> > > checkBalance:207->Object.wait:-2 > > >> > > » TestTimedOut > > >> > > [ERROR] Run 2: TestRegionsOnMasterOptions. > testRegionsOnAllServers > > » > > >> > > Appears to be stuck in t... > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > [ERROR] Tests run: 3604, Failures: 7, Errors: 2, Skipped: 44 > > >> > > [INFO] > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 2018-01-06 15:52 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org > > >> > >: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Deleted the class to get all the tests running. Was running on > the > > >> RC1 > > >> > > > from the tar. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I know get those one failing. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > [ERROR] Failures: > > >> > > > [ERROR] TestFavoredStochasticLoadBalan > > >> cer.test2FavoredNodesDead:352 > > >> > > > Balancer did not run > > >> > > > [ERROR] TestRegionMergeTransactionOnCl > > >> uster.testCleanMergeReference: > > >> > > 284 > > >> > > > hdfs://localhost:45311/user/jmspaggi/test-data/7c269e83- > > >> > > > 5982-449e-8cf8-6babaaaa4c7c/data/default/ > testCleanMergeReference/ > > >> > > > f1bdc6441b090dbacb391c74eaf0d1d0 > > >> > > > [ERROR] Errors: > > >> > > > [ERROR] TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS. > testThreeRSAbort:401 > > » > > >> > > > TableNotFound Region ... > > >> > > > [INFO] > > >> > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 3604, Failures: 2, Errors: 1, Skipped: 44 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I have not been able to get all the tests passed locally for a > > >> while :( > > >> > > > > > >> > > > JM > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 2018-01-06 15:05 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Looks like you didn't include HBASE-19666 which would be in the > > >> next > > >> > RC. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > >> > > >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Trying with a different command line (mvn test -P runAllTests > > >> > > >> > -Dsurefire.secondPartThreadCount=12 > > >> -Dtest.build.data.basedirector > > >> > > >> y=/ram4g > > >> > > >> > ) I get all those one failing. How are you able to get > > >> everything > > >> > > >> passed??? > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > [INFO] Results: > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] Failures: > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > testCompactionRatio:74-> > > >> > TestCom > > >> > > >> > pactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > >> > > compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > >> > testStuckStoreCompaction:145->T > > >> > > >> > estCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > >> > > >> compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Second run: > > >> > > >> > [INFO] Results: > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] Failures: > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > testCompactionRatio:74-> > > >> > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > >> > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > >> > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > >> > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > >> > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Then again: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > [INFO] Results: > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] Failures: > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > testCompactionRatio:74-> > > >> > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > >> > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > >> > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > >> > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > >> > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > >> > > >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> > [INFO] ------------------------------ > > >> ------------------------------ > > >> > > >> > ------------ > > >> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Sound like it's always the exact same result. Do I have a way > > to > > >> > > exclude > > >> > > >> > this TestCompactionPolicy test from the run? > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Here are more details from the last failure: > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > >> > ------------------- > > >> > > >> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > >> > > TestDefaultCompactSelec > > >> > > >> tion > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > >> > ------------------- > > >> > > >> > Tests run: 4, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time > elapsed: > > >> > 1.323 > > >> > > s > > >> > > >> > <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > >> > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > >> > > >> > testStuckStoreCompaction(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserve > > >> > > >> r.TestDefaultCompactSelection) > > >> > > >> > Time elapsed: 1.047 s <<< FAILURE! > > >> > > >> > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but > > >> > was:<[[99, > > >> > > >> 30, > > >> > > >> > ]30, 30, 30]> > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > >> > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction( > > >> > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:145) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > testCompactionRatio(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.Tes > > >> > > >> tDefaultCompactSelection) > > >> > > >> > Time elapsed: 0.096 s <<< FAILURE! > > >> > > >> > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but > > >> was:<[[]]> > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > >> > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio( > > >> > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:74) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,240 WARN [StoreOpener-22ce1d683ba4b6b93 > > >> > > >> 73a3c541ebab2a2-1] > > >> > > >> > util.CommonFSUtils(536): FileSystem doesn't support > > >> > setStoragePolicy; > > >> > > >> > HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available. This is normal and > expected > > >> on > > >> > > >> earlier > > >> > > >> > Hadoop versions. > > >> > > >> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs. > > >> > > LocalFileSystem. > > >> > > >> > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, > java.lang.String) > > >> > > >> > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java: > 2130) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > >> > > >> > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > >> > > setStoragePolicy( > > >> > > >> > CommonFSUtils.java:518) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.region > > >> server.HRegionFileSystem. > > >> > > >> > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > regionserver.HStore.<init>( > > >> > > >> > HStore.java:250) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion. > > >> > > >> > instantiateHStore(HRegion.java:5497) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > > regionserver.HRegion$1.call( > > >> > > >> > HRegion.java:1002) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > > regionserver.HRegion$1.call( > > >> > > >> > HRegion.java:999) > > >> > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTas > > >> k.run(FutureTask.java:266) > > >> > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter. > > >> > > >> > call(Executors.java:511) > > >> > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTas > > >> k.run(FutureTask.java:266) > > >> > > >> > at java.util.concurrent. > ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > > >> > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > > >> > > >> > at java.util.concurrent. > ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > > >> > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > > >> > > >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,322 DEBUG [main] util.CommonFSUtils(538): > > >> > > FileSystem > > >> > > >> > doesn't support setStoragePolicy; HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not > > >> > available. > > >> > > >> This > > >> > > >> > is normal and expected on earlier Hadoop versions. > > >> > > >> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs. > > >> > > LocalFileSystem. > > >> > > >> > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, > java.lang.String) > > >> > > >> > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java: > 2130) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > >> > > >> > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > >> > > setStoragePolicy( > > >> > > >> > CommonFSUtils.java:518) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.region > > >> server.HRegionFileSystem. > > >> > > >> > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > regionserver.HStore.<init>( > > >> > > >> > HStore.java:250) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy. > > >> > > >> > initialize(TestCompactionPolicy.java:109) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > >> > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.setUp(TestCompactionPolicy.java:69) > > >> > > >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl. > invoke0(Native > > >> > > Method) > > >> > > >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > >> > > >> > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > > >> > > >> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > >> > > >> > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > > >> > > >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1. > > >> > > runReflectiveCall( > > >> > > >> > FrameworkMethod.java:50) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.internal.runners.mod > > >> el.ReflectiveCallable.run( > > >> > > >> > ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod. > > >> > invokeExplosively( > > >> > > >> > FrameworkMethod.java:47) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. > > >> > > >> > evaluate(RunBefores.java:24) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. > > >> > statements.RunAfters.evaluate( > > >> > > >> > RunAfters.java:27) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java:325 > > >> > > >> ) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner. > runChild( > > >> > > >> > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner. > runChild( > > >> > > >> > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java:290) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java: > > >> > > >> 71) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( > > >> > > >> > ParentRunner.java:288) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java: > > >> > > >> 58) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( > > >> > > >> > ParentRunner.java:268) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. > > >> > java:363) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java:290) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java: > > >> > > >> 71) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( > > >> > > >> > ParentRunner.java:288) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( > > >> > > ParentRunner.java: > > >> > > >> 58) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( > > >> > > >> > ParentRunner.java:268) > > >> > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. > > >> > java:363) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. > junitcore.JUnitCore.run( > > >> > > >> > JUnitCore.java:55) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. > > junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > >> > > >> > createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. > > junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > >> > > >> > executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. > > junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > >> > > >> > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. > > junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > >> > > >> > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.juni > > >> tcore.JUnitCoreProvider. > > >> > > >> > invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:159) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. > > >> > > >> > invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:373) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. > > >> > > >> > runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:334) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.boot > > >> er.ForkedBooter.execute( > > >> > > >> > ForkedBooter.java:119) > > >> > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. > booter.ForkedBooter.main( > > >> > > >> > ForkedBooter.java:407) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,398 INFO [main] > > hbase.ResourceChecker(172): > > >> > > after: > > >> > > >> > regionserver.TestDefaultCompactSelection#testStuckStoreCompa > > >> ction > > >> > > >> > Thread=11 (was 7) > > >> > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: Monitor thread for TaskMonitor > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.monitoring.TaskMonitor$ > > >> > > >> > MonitorRunnable.run(TaskMonitor.java:302) > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: org.apache.hadoop.fs. > > >> > > FileSystem$Statistics$ > > >> > > >> > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > > >> > > >> > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue. > > remove(ReferenceQueue.java: > > >> > 143) > > >> > > >> > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue. > > remove(ReferenceQueue.java: > > >> > 164) > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Statistics$ > > >> > > >> > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner.run(FileSystem.java:3063) > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: LruBlockCacheStatsExecutor > > >> > > >> > sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos( > > >> > > >> > LockSupport.java:215) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.locks. > AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ > > >> > > >> > ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer. > > java:2078) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > > >> > > >> > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > > >> > > >> > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask( > > >> > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > > >> > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134) > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > > >> > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: StoreOpener- > > >> > > 22ce1d683ba4b6b9373a3c541ebab2 > > >> > > >> > a2-1.LruBlockCache.EvictionThread > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hf > > >> ile.LruBlockCache$EvictionThre > > >> > > >> ad.run( > > >> > > >> > LruBlockCache.java:894) > > >> > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > >> > > >> > - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=232 (was 232), > > >> > > >> > MaxFileDescriptor=1048576 (was 1048576), > SystemLoadAverage=204 > > >> (was > > >> > > >> 204), > > >> > > >> > ProcessCount=273 (was 273), AvailableMemoryMB=4049 (was 4132) > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Full log attached > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > JMS > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > 2018-01-06 9:34 GMT-05:00 Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> I can reproduce the issue locally. I think it has to do with > > the > > >> > java > > >> > > >> >> version being used - IIRC this is related to the version of > > java > > >> > > used, > > >> > > >> but > > >> > > >> >> we can discuss in more detail on the JIRA. > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19721 > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thanks, JMS! > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > >> > > >> >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org > > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > How you guys are able to get the tests running? > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > For me it keeps failing on TestReversedScannerCallable. > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > I tried many times, always fails in the same place. I'm > > >> running > > >> > on > > >> > > a > > >> > > >> 4GB > > >> > > >> >> > tmpfs. Details are below. Am I doing something wrong? > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > JM > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > ./dev-support/hbasetests.sh runAllTests > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > client.TestOperation > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Results: > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> >> > [ERROR] Errors: > > >> > > >> >> > [ERROR] TestReversedScannerCallable.unnecessary Mockito > > >> > > stubbings > > >> > > >> » > > >> > > >> >> > UnnecessaryStubbing > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 245, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8 > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > >> >> ------------ > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase .............................. > ......... > > >> > > SUCCESS > > >> > > >> [ > > >> > > >> >> > 1.409 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Checkstyle > .......................... > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 1.295 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Support > ....................... > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 0.038 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Error Prone Rules > ................... > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 1.069 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Annotations > ......................... > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 1.450 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Configuration > ................. > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 0.073 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded Protocol > ..................... > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 14.292 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Common > .............................. > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > >> >> [01:51 > > >> > > >> >> > min] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics API > ......................... > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 2.878 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Compatibility > ................ > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 12.216 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics Implementation > .............. > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 7.206 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Two Compatibility > ............ > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 12.440 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Protocol > ............................ > > >> > SUCCESS > > >> > > [ > > >> > > >> >> > 0.074 s] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Client > .............................. > > >> > FAILURE > > >> > > >> >> [02:10 > > >> > > >> >> > min] > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Zookeeper > ........................... > > >> > SKIPPED > > >> > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Replication > ......................... > > >> > SKIPPED > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > >> >> > ------------------- > > >> > > >> >> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client. > > >> > > TestReversedScannerCallable > > >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > >> >> > ------------------- > > >> > > >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time > > >> elapsed: > > >> > > >> 1.515 s > > >> > > >> >> <<< > > >> > > >> >> > FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client > > >> > > >> >> .TestReversedScannerCallable > > >> > > >> >> > unnecessary Mockito > > >> > > >> >> > stubbings(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client. > > TestReversedScanner > > >> > > >> Callable) > > >> > > >> >> > Time > > >> > > >> >> > elapsed: 0.014 s <<< ERROR! > > >> > > >> >> > org.mockito.exceptions.misusing. > > UnnecessaryStubbingException: > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > Unnecessary stubbings detected in test class: > > >> > > >> >> TestReversedScannerCallable > > >> > > >> >> > Clean & maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary > > code. > > >> > > >> >> > Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to > > >> > relevant > > >> > > >> line > > >> > > >> >> of > > >> > > >> >> > code): > > >> > > >> >> > 1. -> at > > >> > > >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client. > TestReversedScannerCallable. > > >> > setUp( > > >> > > >> >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:66) > > >> > > >> >> > 2. -> at > > >> > > >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client. > TestReversedScannerCallable. > > >> > setUp( > > >> > > >> >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:68) > > >> > > >> >> > Please remove unnecessary stubbings. More info: javadoc > for > > >> > > >> >> > UnnecessaryStubbingException class. > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > 2018-01-06 0:44 GMT-05:00 stack <saint....@gmail.com>: > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > On Jan 5, 2018 4:44 PM, "Apekshit Sharma" < > > >> a...@cloudera.com> > > >> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > bq. Care needs to be exercised backporting. Bug fixes > only > > >> > > please. > > >> > > >> If > > >> > > >> >> in > > >> > > >> >> > > doubt, ping me, the RM, please. Thanks. > > >> > > >> >> > > In that case, shouldn't we branch out branch-2.0? We can > > >> then > > >> > do > > >> > > >> >> normal > > >> > > >> >> > > backports to branch-2 and only bug fixes to branch-2.0. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty > > Appy? > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > No new features on branch-2? New features are in > > >> master/3.0.0 > > >> > > only? > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > S > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > >> > > >> apurt...@apache.org> > > >> > > >> >> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool is a flake, not a > consistent > > >> fail. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Stack < > st...@duboce.net > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > >> > > >> >> apurt...@apache.org> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > This one is probably my fault: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > HBASE-19406 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Balazs fixed it above, HBASE-19666 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > It can easily be reverted. The failure of interest > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > is TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.tes > > >> > > >> tLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA > > >> > > >> >> Bs. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > This seems fine. Passes in nightly > > >> > > >> >> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view > > >> /H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase% > > >> > > >> >> > > > > 20Nightly/job/branch-2/171/tes > > >> tReport/org.apache.hadoop. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > hbase.regionserver/TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool/ > > >> > > >> >> > > > > and locally against the tag. It fails consistently > for > > >> you > > >> > > >> Andrew? > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Should all unit tests pass on a beta? I think > so, > > at > > >> > > least > > >> > > >> if > > >> > > >> >> the > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > failures > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > are 100% repeatable. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > This is fair. Let me squash this RC and roll > another. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Will put it up in a few hours. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > >> >> > > > > S > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > -0 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > RAT check: ok > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Ran unit tests: some failures (8u144) > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.t > > >> > > >> >> estCompactionRatio:74-> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq > > >> > > >> uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > >> > > >> >> > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq > > >> > > >> uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > compactEquals:201 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, > ]30, > > >> 30, > > >> > > 30]> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool. > > >> > > >> >> > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > SLABs:143 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > All the chunks must have been cleared > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stack < > > >> > > st...@duboce.net> > > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> The first release candidate for HBase > > 2.0.0-beta-1 > > >> is > > >> > up > > >> > > >> at: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > > >> > > >> dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > > >> > > >> >> > > > beta-1-RC0/ > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging > > >> directory > > >> > > >> here: > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/ > > >> content/repositories/ > > >> > > >> >> > > > > orgapachehbase-1188 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC0 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> (0907563eb72697b394b8b960fe54887d6ff304fd) > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. > It > > >> > > includes > > >> > > >> all > > >> > > >> >> > that > > >> > > >> >> > > > was > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > in > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> previous alphas (new assignment manager, > offheap > > >> > > >> read/write > > >> > > >> >> > path, > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> in-memory > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set > are > > >> > sealed. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production > > preview > > >> of > > >> > > >> >> > hbase-2.0.0. > > >> > > >> >> > > > It > > >> > > >> >> > > > > is > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive > > and > > >> > flag > > >> > > us > > >> > > >> >> if we > > >> > > >> >> > > > > messed > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > up > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are > > >> > particular > > >> > > >> >> > interested > > >> > > >> >> > > > in > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far > > can > > >> be > > >> > > >> found > > >> > > >> >> here > > >> > > >> >> > > > [3]. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> There > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 > > >> > > exclusively > > >> > > >> >> can > > >> > > >> >> > be > > >> > > >> >> > > > > found > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- > > >> forgive me > > >> > > if > > >> > > >> >> > > mistakes). > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of > > >> 2.0.0 > > >> > > [6]. > > >> > > >> >> We'll > > >> > > >> >> > do > > >> > > >> >> > > > one > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> more > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release > > >> > Candidate > > >> > > by > > >> > > >> >> the > > >> > > >> >> > end > > >> > > >> >> > > > of > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making > > it > > >> so > > >> > > >> users > > >> > > >> >> can > > >> > > >> >> > do > > >> > > >> >> > > a > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x > > (and > > >> > any > > >> > > >> bug > > >> > > >> >> > fixes > > >> > > >> >> > > > > found > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we > have > > >> > > >> targeted so > > >> > > >> >> > far > > >> > > >> >> > > > for > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> One knownissue is that the User API has not > been > > >> > > properly > > >> > > >> >> > filtered > > >> > > >> >> > > > so > > >> > > >> >> > > > > it > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public > > >> content > > >> > > >> >> > > (HBASE-19663, > > >> > > >> >> > > > to > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > be > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> fixed by beta-2). > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote > on > > >> > whether > > >> > > >> it > > >> > > >> >> ok > > >> > > >> >> > to > > >> > > >> >> > > > put > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > out > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not > > yet > > >> > been > > >> > > >> >> > updated). > > >> > > >> >> > > > Let > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > the > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Monday) > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup? > op=get&search= > > >> > > >> >> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira > > >> > > >> /projects/HBASE/versions/ > > >> > > >> >> > > 12340862 > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > >> > > >> >> > > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > >> > > >> >> > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > -- > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Best regards, > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Andrew > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, > > meaning > > >> > torn > > >> > > >> from > > >> > > >> >> > > > truth's > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > decrepit hands > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > -- > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Best regards, > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Andrew > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, > meaning > > >> torn > > >> > > >> from > > >> > > >> >> > > truth's > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > decrepit hands > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > -- > > >> > > >> >> > > > Best regards, > > >> > > >> >> > > > Andrew > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning > > torn > > >> > from > > >> > > >> >> truth's > > >> > > >> >> > > > decrepit hands > > >> > > >> >> > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > -- > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > -- Appy > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > > > >> > -- Appy > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
