hbase-spark and hbase-prefix-tree modules should no longer be part of the hbase 2.0 build process.
Can you check the files to see if they were left over from previous build ? Cheers On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ashish Singhi <ashishsin...@apache.org> wrote: > RAT check fails for me, below error I see in the log file, > > 4 Unknown Licenses > > ***************************************************** > > Files with unapproved licenses: > > hbase-spark/target/test-classes.-284428056.timestamp > hbase-spark/target/classes.786562742.timestamp > hbase-spark/target/maven-archiver/pom.properties > hbase-prefix-tree/target/maven-archiver/pom.properties > > ***************************************************** > > CHANGES.txt file doesn't look correct. > > > > Downloaded the binary and checked the following, > > - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files, looks ok > > Verified the following in a non-kerberos setup, > - On a one node setup did upgrade from 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT version to > 2.0.0-beta-1 > - Performed get and scan operation on data which were loaded in > 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT version > - Exercised basic shell commands > - Ran LTT with 1M row, checked read and write operations > - Poked around webUI > - Started Rest server and executed few commands > - Checked logs > - Browsed book > > Regards, > Ashish > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > The fourth release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC3/ > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1193 > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]. > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.7 at hash 026f535a7747b89003252ded9 > > 585e827686aa79f > > > > This RC has some nice bug fixes over RC0-2 including fixing MOST of the > > failing and flakey tests (We are still working through them). > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, > in-memory > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed > up > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in > > hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3]. > There > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes). > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one > more > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be > > fixed by beta-2). > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let > the > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Lets say Tuesday morning!) > > > > Thanks, > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862 > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > >
