Good point, we can do that. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there is an imminent 1.3.2 coming, I'd rather see it go directly there > instead of pausing at 1.3.1, but otherwise no major concerns. > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On the thread "Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release > > planning > > " Francis Liu, Zach York, and Ashish Singhi are all in favor of moving > the > > stable pointer forward, based on production and scale testing. Testing > with > > 1.3 we have done at my place of employment also had a positive result: > 1.3 > > survived aggressive tests where 1.1 and 1.2 did not (at the time). > > > > I believe we have arrived at a consensus, so intend to retarget the > stable > > pointer to the latest 1.3 release, 1.3.1. After Francis runs the 1.3.2 > > release, we will move it to 1.3.2. > > > > > > Please write in with objections or concerns if you have them and I'll > hold > > off until the discussion is settled (or if there is an objection). > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
