Duo Zhang created HBASE-20046:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Reconsider the meta schema change in HBASE-9465
                 Key: HBASE-20046
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20046
             Project: HBase
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Replication
            Reporter: Duo Zhang
            Assignee: Duo Zhang
             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.5.0


When implementing HBASE-9465 we added two new families to meta table, one is 
rep meta and the other is rep_position. In general I think rep_meta is OK to 
put into meta table since it records the open and close sequence id for a 
region, but for rep_position, I think it should be put into another system 
table instead of meta table.

This should be done before we finally release 2.0.0 or 1.5.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to