Give me a shout if unsure. I'm trying to put critical bug fixes and
important perf improvements only on branch-2.0. I want to push out a 2.0.1
and have it be more stable and performant than 2.0.0 in the next week or so.

For example, here are some commits below [1] from last day or so. The first
I'd say is not needed on branch-2.0. The two that follow are good because
they help me w/ my perf-compare project.

To be clear, no damage done (No need of 'apologies'!) I'll revert anything
I think destabilizes but just a heads-up on what I'm thinking.

Related, we should start the hbase3/hbase2.1 conversation one of these
days. Would be sweet if we avoided a replay of the hbase2 experience in
hbase3. Would be good too if we took up the Andrew Purtell suggestion of
doing a "left-shift" in how we think about our version numbers; i.e. think
of 3.0.0 as we would have thought of a 2.1.0.

Thanks,
St.Ack

1.
commit d77989e9f7b51f058d09694e5109e3aec05e0596
Author: Mingdao Yang <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat May 5 22:26:12 2018 +0800

    HBASE-20527 Remove unused code in MetaTableAccessor

    Signed-off-by: Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>

commit 81f69e585159840b622b9030e4eb6ebf35a7e6ae
Author: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue May 1 10:58:09 2018 -0700

    HBASE-20513 Collect and emit ScanMetrics in PerformanceEvaluation

commit 3c4fadae4257ff5078d2cc247efc938ea0d350ee
Author: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu May 3 16:25:17 2018 -0700

    HBASE-20517 Fix PerformanceEvaluation 'column' parameter

Reply via email to