Nice job, I will pay attention to the UT too..

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:37 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Merged back to master. Will keep an eye on the nightly build and flakey
> dashboard.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2018-06-28 8:56 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>:
>
> > One week since we start the vote, and now we have 4 binding +1s, a 0, and
> > no -1s, so the vote passes. Let me close the vote.
> >
> > There are still small issues for branch HBASE-19064, will merge back to
> > master after we fix them all.
> >
> > Thanks all for voting.
> >
> >
> > 2018-06-26 18:20 GMT+08:00 Ashish Singhi <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> SGTM. +1
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ashish
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:30 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Here is my +1.
> >> >
> >> > As the performance test shows that there is no performance downgrading
> >> if
> >> > we do not enable sync replication, and the feature basically works, I
> >> think
> >> > it is OK to merge it back to master branch. We will continue working
> on
> >> > polishing and optimizing it for the 3.0 release.
> >> >
> >> > 2018-06-26 14:52 GMT+08:00 OpenInx <[email protected]>:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi guys
> >> > >
> >> > > I've tested the write performance on both master branch and
> >> HBASE-19064
> >> > > branch.  Here's the JIRA [1].
> >> > >
> >> > > The conclusion(Pasted from the comment):
> >> > > The QPS & AVG latency are similar when comparing the master branch
> >> with
> >> > > async replication and HBASE-19064 with async replication.
> >> > > BTW the QPS of HBASE-19064 with sync replication dropped about 13%,
> we
> >> > will
> >> > > continue to optimize the sync replication in phrase#2 [2].
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20751
> >> > > 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20422
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > +1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2018-06-21 18:26 GMT+08:00 mengli721014 on 163 dot com <
> >> > > > [email protected]
> >> > > > >:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > 0
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 使用AquaMail for Android发送
> >> > > > > http://www.aqua-mail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 在 2018年6月21日 下午4:21:26 "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <[email protected]>
> >> 写道:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > In HBASE-19064 we aim to implement sync replication feature for
> >> > HBase.
> >> > > > You
> >> > > > >> can see the design doc for more details on how it works
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/193D3aOxD-muPIZuQfI4Zo3_
> >> > > > >> qg6-Nepeu_kraYJVQkiE/edit#
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> And now the feature basically works, we have tested it on real
> >> > > clusters,
> >> > > > >> and also provide the operational documentation in the ref
> guide.
> >> You
> >> > > can
> >> > > > >> see the 'Synchronous Replication' section in the ref guide of
> >> branch
> >> > > > >> HBASE-19064.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> There are known limitations for this feature, and we have
> >> > > > >> created HBASE-20422 to track them.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Please vote:
> >> > > > >> [+1] Agree
> >> > > > >> [-1] Disagree
> >> > > > >> [0] Neutral
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Thanks.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to