Thanks Andy. Looks good. Maybe next time add -p clientbuffering=true ?
Good on you, S On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:55 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > > A couple of notes and general observations. > > Note all instances remained up for the entire duration of testing including > burn in (all tests ran on the same hardware), and HDFS volumes were built > on locally attached storage (hence C3 generation instances), so I > controlled as much as possible for system level variance. > > Results are quite similar among the releasing 1.x versions and > 1.5-SNAPSHOT. Note measurements are reported in microseconds. > > I thought 1.5-SNAPSHOT might show performance regressions, but the surprise > is in the other direction. It seems to be better performing in the YCSB > scenarios than the other versions tested in most cases. > > There are general small trends toward improvement as reduction in latencies > with the exception of workloads B and F. Workloads B and F, especially when > run against 1.5-SNAPSHOT, may show reduced performance on inserts/mutations > in trade for improved performance in reads/scanning. More testing needed.
