Thanks for the test runs. The diffs are miniscule. After so many releases, would have expected a tendency up or down but not constant (smile).
S On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 5:34 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > Today I did a comparison between 1.2.6.1 and 1.4.9RC1 with YCSB. The > results are close. Overall runtimes are almost the same. In the average and > high percentile measures there is a general upward trend but nothing that > looks like a significant regression. Still for 1.5.0 I think we should see > if it's possible to lower measures made by YCSB closer to those observed > with 1.2. > > Linux version 4.14.55-62.37.amzn1.x86_64 > c3.8xlarge x 5 > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_181-shenandoah-b13) > -Xms20g -Xmx20g -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:+AlwaysPreTouch -XX:+UseNUMA > -XX:-UseBiasedLocking -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled > Hadoop 2.8.5 > Init: Load 100 M rows and snapshot > Run: Delete table, clone and redeploy from snapshot, run 10 M operations > (except 1M for workload E) > Args: -threads 100 -target 50000 (except 10000 for workload E) > > YCSB Workload A > > target 50k/op/s 1.2.6.1 1.4.9 > > > > [OVERALL], RunTime(ms) 200581 200605 > [OVERALL], Throughput(ops/sec) 49855 49849 > [READ], AverageLatency(us) 491 517 > [READ], MinLatency(us) 233 273 > [READ], MaxLatency(us) 140287 165503 > [READ], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 605 647 > [READ], 99thPercentileLatency(us), 880 1031 > [UPDATE], AverageLatency(us) 1332 1327 > [UPDATE], MinLatency(us) 711 692 > [UPDATE], MaxLatency(us) 137215 160383 > [UPDATE], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 1790 1800 > [UPDATE], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 2333 2495 > > YCSB Workload B > > target 50k/op/s 1.2.6.1 1.4.9 > > > > [OVERALL], RunTime(ms) 200569 200566 > [OVERALL], Throughput(ops/sec) 49858 49859 > [READ], AverageLatency(us), 438 445 > [READ], MinLatency(us) 198 216 > [READ], MaxLatency(us) 143615 153343 > [READ], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 539 552 > [READ], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 806 957 > [UPDATE], AverageLatency(us) 1098 1064 > [UPDATE], MinLatency(us) 746 762 > [UPDATE], MaxLatency(us) 141183 149503 > [UPDATE], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 1334 1336 > [UPDATE], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 1695 1777 > > YCSB Workload C > > target 50k/op/s 1.2.6.1 1.4.9 > > > > [OVERALL], RunTime(ms) 200543 200559 > [OVERALL], Throughput(ops/sec) 49865 49861 > [READ], AverageLatency(us) 348 340 > [READ], MinLatency(us) 174 182 > [READ], MaxLatency(us) 140287 161279 > [READ], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 428 421 > [READ], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 793 841 > > YCSB Workload D > > target 50k/op/s 1.2.6.1 1.4.9 > > > > [OVERALL], RunTime(ms) 200557 200577 > [OVERALL], Throughput(ops/sec) 49861 49856 > [READ], AverageLatency(us) 528 503 > [READ], MinLatency(us) 187 213 > [READ], MaxLatency(us) 134655 147199 > [READ], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 1395 991 > [READ], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 1880 1721 > [INSERT], AverageLatency(us) 1272 1245 > [INSERT], MinLatency(us) 830 827 > [INSERT], MaxLatency(us) 124479 140671 > [INSERT], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 1518 1505 > [INSERT], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 2249 2553 > > YCSB Workload E > > target 10k/op/s 1.2.6.1 1.4.9 > > > > [OVERALL], RunTime(ms) 100564 100584 > [OVERALL], Throughput(ops/sec) 9944 9942 > [SCAN], AverageLatency(us) 4297 3700 > [SCAN], MinLatency(us) 765 740 > [SCAN], MaxLatency(us) 1229823 1056767 > [SCAN], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 10503 9855 > [SCAN], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 22655 19007 > [INSERT], AverageLatency(us) 3178 2707 > [INSERT], MinLatency(us) 935 885 > [INSERT], MaxLatency(us) 1020415 148479 > [INSERT], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 5795 4927 > [INSERT], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 13791 9727 > > YCSB Workload F > > target 50k/op/s 1.2.6.1 1.4.9 > > > > [OVERALL], RunTime(ms) 200619 200583 > [OVERALL], Throughput(ops/sec) 49846 49855 > [READ], AverageLatency(us) 577 610 > [READ], MinLatency(us) 246 270 > [READ], MaxLatency(us) 131455 127743 > [READ], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 815 909 > [READ], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 1525 1549 > [READ-MODIFY-WRITE], AverageLatency(us) 2006 2050 > [READ-MODIFY-WRITE], MinLatency(us) 1105 1116 > [READ-MODIFY-WRITE], MaxLatency(us) 164095 178303 > [READ-MODIFY-WRITE], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 2723 2855 > [READ-MODIFY-WRITE], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 4423 4415 > [UPDATE], AverageLatency(us) 1427 1438 > [UPDATE], MinLatency(us) 703 727 > [UPDATE], MaxLatency(us) 80767 128703 > [UPDATE], 95thPercentileLatency(us) 1993 2031 > [UPDATE], 99thPercentileLatency(us) 2727 2751 > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:45 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > The second HBase 1.4.9 release candidate (RC1) is available for download > > at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.9RC1/ and > Maven > > artifacts are available in the temporary repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1240/ > > > > There was no vote on 1.4.9RC0. > > > > The git tag corresponding to the candidate is '1.4.9RC1' (d625b212e4). > > > > A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this release is > > available for your review at > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.9RC1/compat-check-report.html > > . There are no reported compatibility issues. > > > > A list of the 22 issues resolved in this release can be found at > > https://s.apache.org/fNPx . > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try > > to close it Friday December 14, 2018 if we have sufficient votes. > > > > Prior to making this announcement I made the following preflight checks: > > > > RAT check passes (7u80) > > Unit test suite passes 5/5 (7u80, 8u172) > > LTT load 100M rows with 100% verification and 20% updates (8u181) > > ITBLL 500M rows with slowDeterministic monkey (8u181) > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
