If we are concerned about SEO, we should try to set up 301 Redirect to the latest doc when we remove 0.94. That should alleviate some of the problems with users landing on dead links. Over time the result should adjust, or we could set up Google Search Console for HBase site, and trigger a reindex. Not sure if we have someone already owning the SEO aspect of the site.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide land in > 0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear that > suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead. > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sounds good by me. > > > S > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation > > completely > > > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct > link > > > but > > > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost 4 > > > years > > > > old! > > > > > > > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be removed > > from > > > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the documentation > > can > > > be > > > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The > > > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/ > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about: > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/ > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Sakthi > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link > > > > Checker*" > > > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job > > > takes > > > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing > files*" > > > and > > > > > "*7143 > > > > > > missing named anchors*". > > > > > > > > > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are > > > from > > > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the > > master. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803 > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase > > Website > > > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we > > > would > > > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome! > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sakthi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
