Thank you. Will use them.

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:07 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, not "hbase-filesystem" but "Filesystem Integration"
>
> On 5/16/19 2:04 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > Thanks, Biju.
> >
> > I've created "Quotas" and "Scheduler" components. There is also an
> > "hbase-filesystem" component which can be used for the HBOSS project
> > (saw you added a label for that this morning).
> >
> > We'll probably have to beg, but hopefully folks can self-police and use
> > components a bit more rigorously :)
> >
> > On 5/16/19 11:07 AM, Biju N wrote:
> >> Hi Josh,
> >>     JIRA items related to "quota" is the one which I was going through
> >> recently which was not in the component list. It would help if all
> >> supported quota features gets added to the component list.
> >>     The next one which is good to add is "scheduler". To give some
> >> context
> >> why this will help here is the one of the key scheduler related tickets
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11355. With having a
> >> component
> >> "scheduler" it will help any one to quickly filter on them to understand
> >> what was done/implemented and the reasoning which may not be available
> in
> >> the code. Currently it takes some time for users who are not familiar
> >> with
> >> the code base.
> >>
> >> I am sure there are others which need to be added. One request to the
> >> "dev"
> >> team. Before a change is committed, if we can make sure that a
> >> "component"
> >> is assigned to the ticket (some tickets may not need it), JIRA can be a
> >> quick source of documentation. Hope we can update the old tickets as and
> >> when someone goes through with the proper component it belongs to.
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:36 AM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Biju -- we have the ability to define components.
> >>>
> >>> It sounds like the consensus is that folks prefer components over
> >>> free-form labels.
> >>>
> >>> What are the components that you hoped to find that aren't there?
> >>>
> >>> On 5/13/19 6:31 PM, Biju N wrote:
> >>>> FYI. There are instances where we don't have "components" which can
> >>>> help
> >>>> filter a feature for e.g. Quota is a good example. That is a reason
> for
> >>>> using labels. This helps in filtering the tickets and get an
> >>> understanding
> >>>> of a feature.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:36 PM Andrew Purtell
> >>>> <[email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I’ve been using components so am accidentally in agreement. Didn’t
> >>>>> know
> >>>>> which to use, just picked one. We should document this preference.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 13, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Jan Hentschel <
> >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Agree with Sean. I would prefer to use labels where we have
> >>>>>> something,
> >>>>> which is not HBase-specific (such as the “beginner” label), and
> >>> components
> >>>>> otherwise.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Sean Busbey <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Date: Monday, May 13, 2019 at 9:48 PM
> >>>>>> To: dev <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Updating categorical info on Jira
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> labels are shared across the entire jira instance whereas components
> >>>>>> are under the control of the project. personally I prefer
> components.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> the only labels I like are when we use "beginner"  or if we were to
> >>>>>> move away from "Hadoop Flags" to an incompatible change label.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:34 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]
> <mailto:
> >>>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I see BijuN doing a lot of work lately to try to categorize issues
> >>>>>> better. Thanks to him for trying to make Jira more usable in that
> >>> regard!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One concern I have is that we have duplicative categorization:
> >>>>>> components and labels. I prefer components as they push us into
> >>>>>> curated
> >>>>>> "names" whereas a label might have skew in capitalization (e.g.
> >>> "quota",
> >>>>>> "Quota", "quotas", "space quota").
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do others think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sean
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to