I see it is flakey in the GCE build in our flakey list: https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/branch-2.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html
... but not on our apache build list (perhaps the latter is filtered). I'm not voting the RC down. Let me try and take a look at this test since it fails reliably for me. Thanks, S On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 6:28 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> wrote: > TestSplitTransactionOnCluster is flaky from long ago... The test itself > need some refactoring > > Stack <[email protected]> 于2019年5月21日周二 上午8:20写道： > > > Ran the fancy new vote script. Nice. Checked sig. and hash as > just-in-case. > > > > It built from src and ran UTs. See below for a UT that won't pass for me. > > > > Release notes and changes are wonky. Seems to be a global replace of > > version numbers with 2.2.0. > > > > Started it up, loaded data and confirmed it still there after a restart. > > > > S > > > > [ERROR] Errors: > > [ERROR] > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster > > [ERROR] Run 1: TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.tearDown:162 » > TestTimedOut > > test timed out after... > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > > > > TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster > > » > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.testRITStateForRollback(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster) > > [ERROR] Run 1: > TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.testRITStateForRollback:229 > > » TimeoutIO java.uti... > > [ERROR] Run 2: TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.tearDown:162 » > InterruptedIO > > Interrupt while wai... > > [INFO] > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 6:33 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > OK, it passed when running in eclipse, I think it is flaky... > > > > > > +1(binding) > > > Built from src: OK > > > Checked sums & sigs: All matched > > > Rat check: Passed > > > Run all UTs(openjdk8u202): TestClusterRestartFailover is a bit flaky > but > > > overall fine > > > The compatibility report: Should be fine, check all the High Severity > > > problems > > > HBaseSnapshotException and RestoreSnapshotException: Just changed the > > > parameter type from Exception to Throwable, should be fine. > > > QuotaSettings: The constructor is protected and this is class is not > > > supposed to be implemented by users > > > QuotaSettingsFactory: The fromThrottle method is protected > > > MultiRowRangeFilter.RowRange: Just moved the Comparable related stuff > > to > > > its super class, should be fine > > > Permission: Used to be IA.Private so no problem > > > > > > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> 于2019年5月20日周一 下午3:20写道： > > > > > > > TestClusterRestartFailover fails for me consistently. Anyway it is in > > the > > > > flaky list. Let me dig more. > > > > > > > > Biju N <[email protected]> 于2019年5月19日周日 上午4:09写道： > > > > > > > >> Thanks Andrew. Provided a doc patch in > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22443 for more > visibility > > > of > > > >> the script. > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 1:01 PM Andrew Purtell < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > There is also a helpful script in dev-support/hbase-vote.sh that > > will > > > >> > download the candidate and apply the signature checks, RAT check, > > > source > > > >> > build, and unit test steps that are typical of how we evaluate RCs > > by > > > >> hand. > > > >> > > > > >> > > On May 18, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Biju N <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hi Guanghao, > > > >> > > Is there is standard set of commands used to satisfy the > > > >> requirement > > > >> > > <https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.rc.voting> to verify > > and > > > >> vote > > > >> > for > > > >> > > a release? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Biju > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 2:12 AM Guanghao Zhang < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Please vote on this release candidate (RC) for Apache HBase > > 2.2.0. > > > >> > >> This is the first release of the branch-2.2 line. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > > >> > >> [] +1 > > > >> > >> [] +0/-0 Because ... > > > >> > >> [] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> The tag to be voted on is 2.2.0RC4. The release files, > including > > > >> > >> signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.0RC4/ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1312 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Signatures used for HBase RCs can be found in this file: > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> The list of bug fixes going into 2.2.0 can be found in included > > > >> > >> CHANGES.md and RELEASENOTES.md available here: > > > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.0RC4/CHANGES.md > > > >> > >> > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.0RC4/RELEASENOTES.md > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this > > release > > > is > > > >> > >> available at > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.0RC4/api_compare_2.2.0RC4_to_2.1.4.html > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> To learn more about Apache HBase, please see > > > >> http://hbase.apache.org/ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Thanks, > > > >> > >> Guanghao Zhang > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
