Hi team, Sorry for disturbing, but we really need your kind suggestion. We want to know the appropriate way that Hbase community can accept. Which I mentioned the options in the past email for HBASE ARM support are: 1. Introducing an new ARM CI(3rd party CI), which provided by OpenLab, OpenLab will provide the ARM resources and people resources to develop and maintain the CI status.
2. Still using the old CI(Apache Jenkins(https://builds.apache.org)), OpenLab will provide more ARM resources to help test and build hbase on ARM in the old development process. That means we can just provide the ARM resources into your exist ARM test. Notes: the ARM resources provided by OpenLab are Virtual Machines. Also we will provide the human resources(ME- ZhaoBo) to fix the ARM related issues for Hbase, and maintain the ARM CI status is good, including option 1 and 2. And I'm glad to do this and maintain in the future, if there are some issues break Hbase on ARM, I will also try to report to JIRA and fix in Hbase. We not only aim to just build Hbase success on ARM, but also plan to add more test cases on ARM, such as the same with Hbase already done on X86. So I'm looking forward to get your(Hbase team) choice. Thank you very much. Best Regards, ZhaoBo [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> 19/06/26 下午5:12:38 bo zhaobo <[email protected]> 于2019年6月23日周日 下午7:00写道： > Any updates from team? Thanks you > >> > [image: Mailtrack] > <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> > Sender > notified by > Mailtrack > <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> > 19/06/21 > 下午3:37:23 > *×*REMOVE <#m_-6684894170990945484_m_9060835149257889588_> >
