[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell reopened HBASE-22810:
------------------------------------
Bisect fingers this as breaking TestFlushSnapshotFromClient on branch-1
{noformat}
eb6b617d92998b887c8d811769c6a9d80b653432 is the first bad commit
commit eb6b617d92998b887c8d811769c6a9d80b653432
Author: openinx <open...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Aug 15 10:57:42 2019 +0800
HBASE-22810 Initialize an separate ThreadPoolExecutor for taking/restoring
snapshot (#486)
.../apache/hadoop/hbase/executor/EventType.java | 4 +--
.../apache/hadoop/hbase/executor/ExecutorType.java | 1 +
.../java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java | 27 ++++++++++++++++
.../org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/HMaster.java | 29 +++++++++--------
.../hadoop/hbase/executor/TestExecutorService.java | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
{noformat}
> Initialize an separate ThreadPoolExecutor for taking/restoring snapshot
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-22810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22810
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Zheng Hu
> Assignee: Zheng Hu
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.5.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.2.1, 2.1.6, 1.3.6, 1.4.11
>
>
> In EventType class, we have the following definition, means taking snapshot
> & restoring snapshot are use the MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS Executor now.
> {code}
> /**
> * Messages originating from Client to Master.<br>
> * C_M_SNAPSHOT_TABLE<br>
> * Client asking Master to snapshot an offline table.
> */
> C_M_SNAPSHOT_TABLE (48, ExecutorType.MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS),
> /**
> * Messages originating from Client to Master.<br>
> * C_M_RESTORE_SNAPSHOT<br>
> * Client asking Master to restore a snapshot.
> */
> C_M_RESTORE_SNAPSHOT (49, ExecutorType.MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS),
> {code}
> But when I checked the MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS thread pool initialization, I
> see :
> {code}
> private void startServiceThreads() throws IOException{
> // ... some other code initializing ....
> // We depend on there being only one instance of this executor running
> // at a time. To do concurrency, would need fencing of enable/disable of
> // tables.
> // Any time changing this maxThreads to > 1, pls see the comment at
> // AccessController#postCompletedCreateTableAction
>
> this.executorService.startExecutorService(ExecutorType.MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS,
> 1);
> startProcedureExecutor();
> {code}
> That's to say, for CPs enable or disable table sequencely, we will create
> a ThreadPoolExecutor with threadPoolSize=1. Then we actually cann't
> accomplish the snapshoting concurrence even if they are total difference
> tables, says if there are two table snapshoting request, and the Table A cost
> 5min for snapshoting, then the Table B need to wait 5min and once Table A
> finish its snapshot , then Table B will start the snapshot.
> While we've setting the snapshot timeout, so it will be easy to timeout for
> table B snapshoting . Actually, we can create a separate thead pool for
> snapshot operations only.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
