+1 for EOM

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 10:57 Jan Hentschel <jan.hentsc...@ultratendency.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> From: Sakthi <sak...@apache.org>
> Reply-To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> Date: Monday, December 2, 2019 at 3:32 AM
> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] EOM branch-1.3
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 6:28 PM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com
> <mailto:andrew.purt...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> +1 for EOL of 1.3.
>
> Onward to 1.6!
>
>
> > On Dec 1, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org<mailto:
> bus...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > It's been about a month since the last 1.3.z release came out. We've
> > been talking about EOM for branch-1.3 for about a year. Most recently,
> > we had a growing consensus[1] to EOM after getting the 1.3.6 release
> > out with the fixes for Jackson in HBASE-22728 out.
> >
> > Looking at the things that have since landed in branch-1.3 and nothing
> > looks critical (these are all Major or Minor)[2]:
> >
> >  - HBASE-23149 hbase shouldPerformMajorCompaction logic is not correct
> >  - HBASE-23185 High cpu usage because getTable()#put() gets config
> > value every time
> >  - HBASE-23261 Region stuck in transition while splitting
> >  - HBASE-18439 Subclasses of o.a.h.h.chaos.actions.Action all use the
> > same logger
> >  - HBASE-23207 Log a region open journal
> >  - HBASE-23250 Log message about CleanerChore delegate initialization
> > should be at INFO
> >
> > Someone on 1.3.6 can get all these same things fixed by upgrading to
> > our current stable release.
> >
> > Releases on 1.3.z started in 2017. The branch has only averaged ~2
> > maintenance releases a year; I think reflecting a lack of community
> > interest in maintaining the branch. For comparison 1.4 started about a
> > year later and has already had twice as many maintenance releases.
> >
> >  - 1.3.0: 2017-01-16
> >  - 1.3.1: 2017-04-21
> >  - 1.3.2: 2018-03-07
> >  - 1.3.2.1: 2018-06-13
> >  - 1.3.3: 2018-12-21
> >  - 1.3.5: 2019-06-10
> >  - 1.3.6: 2019-10-20
> >
> > Any objections to shutting branch-1.3 down? If folks show up down the
> > road and want to do the work of maintaining it for some reason, we can
> > always spin it up again.
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> > There's more background if you search farther back, but most recently:
> >
> > * "Considering immediate EOL of branch-1.3 and branch-1.4"
> > https://s.apache.org/f32d0
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22728
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22835
> > * ANNOUNCE for 1.3.6 included a warning
> > "This is ought to be the last release in the 1.3 line unless something
> > critical comes up within in the next month or so."
> >
> > [2]:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12346250
>
>
>

Reply via email to