Releasing HBase 3 snapshots off master would be fine by me. 

> On Jan 3, 2020, at 7:37 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> A while back I offered to start making hbase 3 alpha releases so we had
> something we could all refer to in test environments. That offer still
> stands.
> 
> 
> I personally would still rather those releases be off of the master branch
> because we still have too many branches given our tooling for backports.
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 21:30 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Why not start a branch-3 and begin SNAPSHOT releasing of this branch right
>> now?
>> 
>> +1 to dropping Hadoop 2 support in HBase 3. We need the major increment to
>> make this kind of change, let’s take the opportunity.
>> 
>> Regarding Hadoop 2, the discussion I have seen indicates Hadoop thinks it
>> will be releasing 2.x for up to two more years. I don’t know how many
>> releases there will actually be but let’s assume at least one more 2.9, and
>> a few 2.10. My employer is expected to use these versions along a
>> transition path to 3.x for at least the next eighteen months. We are
>> probably typical. We won’t need Hadoop 2 support for a HBase 3 but will
>> need it for HBase 1 and HBase 2 for “a couple years”.
>> 
>>>> On Jan 3, 2020, at 6:52 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I personally like having Hadoop 2 support still, but I agree the cadence
>>> out of Hadoop has been problematic.
>>> 
>>> I would prefer we not change the state of Hadoop support in the master
>>> branch until we have a release plan of some kind for HBase 3. I'd rather
>>> that be sooner rather than later.
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 18:08 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Support Hadoop 2.x in 3.0.0 means we need to carry it over the whole 3.x
>>>> release lines, which seems to be a problem since the Hadoop community do
>>>> not want to new 2.x release line any more...
>>>> 
>>>> Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>于2020年1月4日 周六06:55写道:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> We will only remove the hadoop 2.x support from hbase 3.x, which does
>>>> not
>>>>>> have a formal release plan yet, for 2.x we will still support hadoop
>>>> 2.x.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Indeed there is no formal release plan for HBase-3.0, but I hope it's
>>>>> sooner than 2+ years away! What's the motivation for dropping Hadoop2
>>>>> support?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午8:57写道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> With my Hadoop hat's on, we have not yet officially declared Hadoop
>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>> EOL. I think the 2.8 download missing from the web page is just a
>>>>>> mistake.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That being said, some of the biggest Hadoop users (LinkedIn, Yahoo,
>>>>>>> Microsoft) that I am aware of are moving up from 2.7/2.8 to 2.10, and
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> 2.8.5 (the last version in the 2.8 line) was released in Sep 2018,
>>>> more
>>>>>>> than a year ago. It doesn't look like the community has the desire to
>>>>>>> continue the 2.8 line.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think it is a little extreme to remove hadoop2 profile, given that
>>>>>> Hadoop
>>>>>>> 2.9 and 2.10 are still active and I expect Hadoop 2 to stay around
>>>> for
>>>>> at
>>>>>>> least 2 years out.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:41 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hadoop 2.8.x has been removed from the download page of hadoop so I
>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>> it is time to bump the hadoop dependency to 2.9.x, on master an
>>>>>> branch-2.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> And the hadoop community is going to make 2.10.x the last minor
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> line for 2.x
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cab84265d632b90d66dcd1ad957a7439a2c76a987c7e62feafb4812e%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think this is a sign that the community is moving forward to 3.x.
>>>>> So
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> propose we make the master branch hadoop3 only, This requires
>>>>> changing
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> pom a bit to active hadoop3 profile by default and remove the
>>>> hadoop2
>>>>>>>> profile.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thoughts? Thanks.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to