Set read-only for EOL branches? Similar to protected branch in gitlab. Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> 于2020年5月21日周四 上午9:23写道：
> What we do at $dayjob is rename old branches old/*. > So we could rename EOL branches this way? E.g. > > for branch in branch-2.1 ... ; do > git checkout $branch && > git branch -m old/$branch && > git push $origin old/$branch :$branch > done > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:21 PM Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why remove old/unused branches? To keep our garden tidy. They’re > > distracting at best, confusing at worst. For old release line branches, > > it’s not clear to a casual committer which branches need to receive a > back > > port. It’s clear if the EOL branches are gone. > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 18:06 Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 for remove feature branches and start a case-by-case discussion for > > > "others". > > > > > > And for branchs of old release line, what's the harm if keep them? I > > > thought we don't need to remove them. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> 于2020年5月21日周四 上午8:14写道： > > > > > > > What is the benefit? > > > > > > > > Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>于2020年5月21日 周四07:31写道： > > > > > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > > > > > We have lots of branches hanging around in git. These appear to be > > > > > 1. branches for old release lines (i.e., 0.90), > > > > > 2. feature branches (that are potentially stale, i.e., > HBASE-11288), > > > > > 3. "other" (i.e., 0.89-fb, former_0.20, revert-1633-HBASE-24221). > > > > > > > > > > Can we decide it's okay to delete some of these? > > > > > > > > > > For (1), all of our release tags, going back to 0.1, are preserved. > > > > There's > > > > > no benefit to keeping these. > > > > > > > > > > For (2), I think there's no discussion required, just someone to go > > > check > > > > > each Jira ID, and delete any that are closed, maybe with a comment > on > > > the > > > > > Jira first. Maybe this could be automated? > > > > > > > > > > For (3), I suppose we need a case-by-case discussion? Maybe there > are > > > > > categories of these that can be resolved in blocks. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
