[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-2600.
------------------------------
Resolution: Later
Now we use reverse scan to search in meta so I do not think this is an issue
now? Resolve as later. Feel free to reopen if someone has interest.
> Change how we do meta tables; from tablename+STARTROW+randomid to instead,
> tablename+ENDROW+randomid
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2600
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2600
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Stack
> Priority: Major
> Attachments:
> 0001-Changed-regioninfo-format-to-use-endKey-instead-of-s.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600-v11.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v2.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v4.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v6.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v7.2.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v8,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v8.1,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v9.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen.patch,
> 0001-HBASE-2600.v10.patch, 2600-trunk-01-17.txt,
> HBASE-2600+5217-Sun-Mar-25-2012-v3.patch,
> HBASE-2600+5217-Sun-Mar-25-2012-v4.patch, hbase-2600-root.dir.tgz, jenkins.pdf
>
>
> This is an idea that Ryan and I have been kicking around on and off for a
> while now.
> If regionnames were made of tablename+endrow instead of tablename+startrow,
> then in the metatables, doing a search for the region that contains the
> wanted row, we'd just have to open a scanner using passed row and the first
> row found by the scan would be that of the region we need (If offlined
> parent, we'd have to scan to the next row).
> If we redid the meta tables in this format, we'd be using an access that is
> natural to hbase, a scan as opposed to the perverse, expensive
> getClosestRowBefore we currently have that has to walk backward in meta
> finding a containing region.
> This issue is about changing the way we name regions.
> If we were using scans, prewarming client cache would be near costless (as
> opposed to what we'll currently have to do which is first a
> getClosestRowBefore and then a scan from the closestrowbefore forward).
> Converting to the new method, we'd have to run a migration on startup
> changing the content in meta.
> Up to this, the randomid component of a region name has been the timestamp of
> region creation. HBASE-2531 "32-bit encoding of regionnames waaaaaaayyyyy
> too susceptible to hash clashes" proposes changing the randomid so that it
> contains actual name of the directory in the filesystem that hosts the
> region. If we had this in place, I think it would help with the migration to
> this new way of doing the meta because as is, the region name in fs is a hash
> of regionname... changing the format of the regionname would mean we generate
> a different hash... so we'd need hbase-2531 to be in place before we could do
> this change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
