+1 for the artifacts on dist.a.o for 2.4.0 RC1 I'd rather we not use the staged nexus repo orgapachehbase-1416 because it appears to have some errors. specifically there's a duplicative '.asc.asc' file for each signed artifact that gpg can't verify.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:29 AM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > The temporary Maven repository is now available at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1416/ > . > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:04 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Please vote on this Apache hbase release candidate, hbase-2.4.0RC1 > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache hbase 2.4.0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > The tag to be voted on is 2.4.0RC1: > > > > https://github.com/apache/hbase/tree/2.4.0RC1 > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as CHANGES.md > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.4.0RC1/ > > > > Customarily Maven artifacts would be available in a staging repository. > > Unfortunately I was forced to terminate the Maven deploy step after > > the upload ran for more than four hours and my build equipment > > needed to be relocated, with loss of network connectivity. This RC has > > been delayed long enough. A temporary Maven repository is not a > > requirement for a vote. I will retry Maven deploy tomorrow. I can > > promise the artifacts for this RC will be staged in Apache Nexus and > > ready for release well ahead of the earliest possible time this vote > > can complete. > > > > Artifacts were signed with the apurt...@apache.org key which can be found > > in: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS > > > > The API compatibility report for this RC can be found at: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.4.0RC1/api_compare_2.4.0RC1_to_2.3.0.html > > > > The changes are mostly added methods, which conform to the compatibility > > guidelines for a new minor release. There is one change to the public > > Region interface that alters the return type of a method. This is > > equivalent to a removal then addition and can be a binary compatibility > > problem. However to your RM's eye the change looks intentional and is > > part of an API improvement project, and a compatibility method is not > > possible here because Java doesn't consider return type when deciding if > > one method signature duplicates another. > > > > To learn more about Apache HBase, please see > > > > http://hbase.apache.org/ > > > > Thanks, > > Your HBase Release Manager > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk
