We still need more votes here for merging the feature branch back.

As this is a code change, the committee's vote will also be counted,
not only the PMC member's vote will be counted.

Thanks.

Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月24日周五 18:02写道:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> The idea and solution is great!
>
> Thanks.
>
> Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:31写道:
>
> > There is a previous thread[1] to mention that the main development work on
> > HBASE-26233[2] is done. And now the testing work has been done too, so I
> > send this official vote to merge for HBASE-26233 back into master.
> >
> > For those who are not familiar with HBASE-26233, it is for re-implementing
> > the region replication framework, to decouple with the general replication
> > framework. You could see the design doc[3] for more details. I've also
> > opened a PR against master[4], PTAL if you have interest.
> >
> > You can see the final test result on HBASE-26487[5].
> > In conclusion, there is no regression on performance when running PE.
> > Using the new tool introduced in HBASE-26540[6], the new implementation can
> > perform much better than the old implementation. When inserting 1M rows,
> > the max lag on secondary replica is 335ms, and the 99.9% lag is 3 only 3ms,
> > while the lag of the old implementation highly depends on the
> > replication.source.sleepforretries config but you should not set it to a
> > very small value as it will waste a lot of resources.
> > On IntegrationTestRegionReplicaReplication, both implementations can not
> > pass but the problems are not related to the changing part, so should not
> > be a blocker. Will file follow on issues to address these problems.
> >
> > The vote will open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Please vote:
> > +1: Merge the changes from HBASE-26233 to master
> > -1: Do not merge these changes because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/t8w053kpy9pj1vg1x3c0kjjh4ongrxzy
> > 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26233
> > 3.
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WPSBwRqIPgTrPRM2wtzAe-3XUvA9S7auWy3Fy8xuZLc/edit
> > 4. https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3891
> > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26487
> > 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26540
> >

Reply via email to