sorry for the delay, I'm back on this track, all the planned tasks for hbase-connector 1.1.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12349655 and hbase-connector 1.0.1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12345436 have been completed.
somehow, I'm wondering if we should fix the log4j issue (replaced with reload4j?) before a new release, such that I filed https://github.com/apache/hbase-connectors/pull/94 but I think the best is to wait till upstream hbase, hadoop and spark-core have fixed the log4j issue. so, if we postpone the release for hbase-connector till then, what do you think? Thanks, Stephen On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. to Sean's point of "convenience binaries compiled against Spark 3 as > well", sorry that I didn't get your words at the beginning, I will make > sure the 1.1.0 release will have compiled binaries for spark 2 and spark 3 > (if anything fails spark3, I will file JIRAs for them) > > 2. (cont.) update on this thread, HBASE-16247 has been sidelined (thanks > Sean), HBASE-24356 and HBASE-22338 should be the blockers, and let's see > how the communication goes (I may pick up them if needed). > In addition, I'm proposing to have a 1.1.0 instead of 1.0.1 release, and > move all the removed JIRAs with a fixed version of 1.0.1 to 1.1.0. > > I should be actively working on them next week before doing the actual > release. > > (sorry that I used a different email in my last reply) > > -Stephen > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:29 AM Stephen Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Sean and Duo for your inputs, I have few questions before we > > move forward. > > > > 1. For Spark 3.0 support, HBASE-25326 seems to already allow building > > it with spark-3.0, or doesn't it work? > > 2. For the upcoming release version, after reviewing the comments on > > HBASE-26491, I found two pending releases, 1.1.0 (3 overall item, 0 > > pending issues) and 1.0.1 (46 issues, 3 pending issues, HBASE-22338, > > HBASE-25326, HBASE-16247). should we have a 1.0.1 release? > > > > Thanks, > > Stephen > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Thank you Tak Lon Wu. This is really a great news. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26491 > > > > > > In this issue, we noticed that the problem has already been fixed but not > > > released yet... > > > > > > It will be good if we could have a 1.1.0 release soon. > > > > > > Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2021年12月7日周二 07:45写道： > > > > > > > That'd be great! > > > > > > > > I can help with release process. > > > > > > > > I'd like us to ensure this go around we have convenience binaries > > compiled > > > > against Spark 3 as well. That's been a long standing need. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 16:43 Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > > While I'm learning how to release a minor version of hbase via > > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#releasing and an example of 2.3.7 > > > > > via HBASE-26373, I found hbase-connector was last released on 2019 > > > > > April. > > > > > > > > > > So, I'm wondering if I could help to release hbase-connector e.g. > > > > > 1.1.0 and get familiar with the release process, at the same time, I > > > > > may need a mentor/adviser and discuss the steps/tasks about it (my > > > > > plan is to create JIRAs like HBASE-26373). > > > > > > > > > > any comments? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > > > >
