Thanks for the update. I see it's been committed to branch-2.5 already. On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 3:02 AM Wellington Chevreuil < [email protected]> wrote:
> Have one more last minute bug fix: HBASE-27069 - SecureBulkload permission > regression. > > Em seg., 30 de mai. de 2022 às 18:56, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > escreveu: > > > All known significant issues are resolved. Flaky tests have been found > > using repeated suite invocation on x86_64 and aarch64 test hosts. Use > this > > link to find the open issues: https://s.apache.org/hbase-2.5.0-issues > > > > Load testing with LTT, ITBLL, and ITLCC has completed successfully. > > > > Chaos testing with ITBLL will be underway soon. > > > > The RC0 will be posted tomorrow. There will be a compatibility report > > associated with it that may generate some discussion. I am not expecting > > the RC0 to pass but we need it in order for people to begin evaluation of > > it and related concerns. > > > > Of the remaining open issues: > > - HBASE-26192 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26192> > [minor] > > is implemented but I am still working on a mock based unit test for it, > > which is half done, so you can assume this one is done. There is a PR > > awaiting review for the servlet itself. Implementation is simple. > > - HBASE-26844 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26844> > [minor] > > is something I hope one of my colleagues will address soon but is not > > urgent and can be deferred to 2.5.1, as it is only a test flake. > > - HBASE-27022 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27022> > [minor] > > is an issue with SFT but SFT will be marked experimental so this has been > > deferred. > > - HBASE-27064 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27064> > [minor] > > is fixed and awaiting PR review. > > - HBASE-27067 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27067> > [minor] > > is fixed and awaiting PR review. > > - HBASE-27070 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27070> > [minor] > > is an issue with the Region Visualizer in what can be expected to be a > > common test configuration. This one should be addressed before release. > > - All other issues are minor priority filings for unit tests that are > > sometimes flaky. In some cases the flakiness manifests only on aarch64, > > which is a platform as yet of secondary concern. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > -- Best regards, Andrew Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles - It's what we’ve earned Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long? Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
