Or perhaps we shouldn't skip over these shaded results. I don't actually see these issues reported twice.
Please disregard. On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:19 PM Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > Heya, > > Browsing through the report on 2.5.0RC1, I find I'm scrolling past the > changes reported in the shaded artifacts because they are a repeat of > what's observed in the core jars. Because they are generated from the core > libraries, should we exclude these shaded artifacts from the report? Asked > a different way, is there anything specific that a reviewer should be > looking for in the report as pertaining to the shaded artifacts? > > Thanks, > Nick >
