I am +1 to use a feature branch. On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:20 AM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> or maybe we create a new feature branch hadoop-33-ozone that has these > interfaces and ozone related support, then we put all the feature changes > into this feature branch and merge later? > > The problem I see is that it's hard and very confusing to maintain two > hadoop3 profiles, and I can see sooner or later hadoop 3.2.x could be EOL. > > Thanks, > Stephen > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:32 AM Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > How about using a new hadoop 3.3 profile for features that are explicitly > > present in 3.3 (like FileSystem changes)? When the time comes, we switch > to > > 3.3 profile by default and drop old hadoop 3 profile that supports 3.2.x > > versions as of today? > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 7:11 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> In general, in HBase, we will use the last patch release of the oldest > >> supported hadoop release line as our default hadoop dependency. > >> > >> For example, since we claim that 3.x will support hadoop 3.2.x and > >> 3.3.x, then we will declare the default hadoop version as 3.2.4. > >> > >> I think we can discuss whether to move up to 3.3.6 as the default > >> version, if there are no compatibility issues when communicating with > >> 3.2.x hadoop clusters. > >> > >> But if we want to use the features which are only provided in 3.3.6, > >> then we should be careful as this means our users can not build hbase > >> with 3.2.x any more, which means we have dropped the support for > >> 3.2.x. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> 于2023年6月16日周五 06:03写道： > >> > > >> > Hi HBase devs, > >> > > >> > Over the past few years HBase supports the default Hadoop version of > >> 3.2.x > >> > but it also works on Hadoop 3.3.x. > >> > > >> > I'm wondering if it makes sense to move the current default > >> hadoop.version > >> > <https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/pom.xml#L800> from 3.2.4 > >> to > >> > 3.3.x. > >> > > >> > Why? > >> > > >> > 1. From a stability and security point of view, Hadoop 3.3 is the most > >> up > >> > to date release line. And all HBase tests pass using 3.3.x. There > hasn't > >> > been a new Hadoop 3.2.x release for over a year. > >> > > >> > 2. We have a feature (using HBase on Ozone) that depends on an API in > >> > Hadoop 3.3.6 that is not yet in any 3.2 release line. Moving the > default > >> > hadoop version to 3.3.6 will save a lot of hassle. > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Weichiu > >> > > >
