Thanks for making the release, Stephen.

Folks, we need some more votes!

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:34 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just go ahead and make the release :)
>
> Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <tak...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 01:48写道:
> >
> > we should have a new release.....the last round I was asking and it was
> > blocked by the log4j, it should be fine...now but we need to check again.
> >
> > not sure about how normal uses use it, but at our end, we upgrade those
> > necessary dependencies and run with those connectors.
> >
> > if no one would like to do it, I will give a try after the Community over
> > code.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 4:25 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > So any updates here?
> > >
> > > There are several commits to hbase connectors repo recently.
> > >
> > > I wonder how our users will make use of it without a new release...
> > >
> > > Reid Chan <reidchan0...@gmail.com> 于2023年8月4日周五 13:22写道:
> > > >
> > > > Seems no upgrade for the release plan
> > > >
> > > > hope it could be re-start again
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > R.C
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 6:45 AM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> tak...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > sorry for the delay, I'm back on this track,
> > > > >
> > > > > all the planned tasks for hbase-connector 1.1.0
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12349655
> and
> > > > > hbase-connector 1.0.1
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12345436
> have
> > > > > been completed.
> > > > >
> > > > > somehow, I'm wondering if we should fix the log4j issue (replaced
> with
> > > > > reload4j?) before a new release, such that I filed
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/hbase-connectors/pull/94 but I think the
> > > > > best is to wait till upstream hbase, hadoop and spark-core have
> fixed
> > > > > the log4j issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > so, if we postpone the release for hbase-connector till then, what
> do
> > > you
> > > > > think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stephen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> > > tak...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. to Sean's point of "convenience binaries compiled against
> Spark 3
> > > as
> > > > > > well", sorry that I didn't get your words at the beginning, I
> will
> > > make
> > > > > > sure the 1.1.0 release will have compiled binaries for spark 2
> and
> > > spark
> > > > > 3
> > > > > > (if anything fails spark3, I will file JIRAs for them)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. (cont.) update on this thread, HBASE-16247 has been sidelined
> > > (thanks
> > > > > > Sean), HBASE-24356 and HBASE-22338 should be the blockers, and
> let's
> > > see
> > > > > > how the communication goes (I may pick up them if needed).
> > > > > > In addition, I'm proposing to have a 1.1.0 instead of 1.0.1
> release,
> > > and
> > > > > > move all the removed JIRAs with a fixed version of 1.0.1 to
> 1.1.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I should be actively working on them next week before doing the
> > > actual
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (sorry that I used a different email in my last reply)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Stephen
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:29 AM Stephen Wu
> > > <tak...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Sean and Duo for your inputs, I have few questions
> before we
> > > > > > > move forward.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. For Spark 3.0 support, HBASE-25326 seems to already allow
> > > building
> > > > > > > it with spark-3.0, or doesn't it work?
> > > > > > > 2. For the upcoming release version, after reviewing the
> comments
> > > on
> > > > > > > HBASE-26491, I found two pending releases, 1.1.0 (3 overall
> item, 0
> > > > > > > pending issues) and 1.0.1 (46 issues, 3 pending issues,
> > > HBASE-22338,
> > > > > > > HBASE-25326, HBASE-16247). should we have a 1.0.1 release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Stephen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:26 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you Tak Lon Wu. This is really a great news.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26491
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In this issue, we noticed that the problem has already been
> fixed
> > > > > but not
> > > > > > > > released yet...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It will be good if we could have a 1.1.0 release soon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2021年12月7日周二 07:45写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That'd be great!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I can help with release process.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'd like us to ensure this go around we have convenience
> > > binaries
> > > > > > > compiled
> > > > > > > > > against  Spark 3 as well. That's been a long standing need.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 16:43 Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> > > tak...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > While I'm learning how to release a minor version of
> hbase
> > > via
> > > > > > > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#releasing and an
> example
> > > of
> > > > > 2.3.7
> > > > > > > > > > via HBASE-26373, I found hbase-connector was last
> released on
> > > > > 2019
> > > > > > > > > > April.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So, I'm wondering if I could help to release
> hbase-connector
> > > e.g.
> > > > > > > > > > 1.1.0 and get familiar with the release process, at the
> same
> > > > > time, I
> > > > > > > > > > may need a mentor/adviser and discuss the steps/tasks
> about
> > > it
> > > > > (my
> > > > > > > > > > plan is to create JIRAs like HBASE-26373).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > any comments?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Stephen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to