I have marked this version as "archived". On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:42 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there are already commits to the branch, usually we should archive > that version instead of deleting it. > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2024年2月17日周六 03:45写道： > > > > Sounds right to me. > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 7:40 AM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Heya team, > > > > > > I noticed that we still have thirdparty-3.5.2 as an unreleased version > in > > > Jira. Looking at the release archives [0], I don't see that release in > our > > > history -- it appears that the world has moved on. However, we have a > > > couple tickets [1] assigned to this release. All 5 of these tickets are > > > also marked as released on a later 4.x release. Checking the pom on > > > branch-2.4, it has moved on to thirdparty-4.x releases. Thus, I > conclude > > > that we've completely moved on to thirdparty-4.x releases, that we can > > > leave 3.5.1 as the final thirdparty-3.x release, and I can delete the > 3.5.2 > > > unreleased version. > > > > > > Does this sound right to you? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nick > > > > > > [0]: https://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12350365 > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles - > > It's what we’ve earned > > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long? > > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on > > - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse >
