I agree that if these are tools we ship to users, they should be exposed in the driver. However, probably we want to keep them LimitedPrivate(Tool) instead of making them fully IA.Public.
-n On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 12:49, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, then let's file an issue to promote it to IA.Public and add it to > Driver. > > Thanks. > > Pankaj Kumar <pankajkumarbi...@gmail.com> 于2024年6月5日周三 17:48写道： > > > > It looks like a typo and unintentional. > > > > Regards, > > Pankaj > > > > On Wed, 5 Jun, 2024, 2:55 pm Wellington Chevreuil, < > > wellington.chevre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It seems it was marked that way by HBASE-20212, which bulk marked many > > > public classes as I.A. Private, as part of the efforts to replace the > > > old TestInterfaceAudienceAnnotations validation by warbucks plugin, > however > > > I don't see any discussions about which I.A. level should be applied to > > > each class, so it looks unintentional. > > > > > > Em qua., 5 de jun. de 2024 às 09:57, 张铎(Duo Zhang) < > palomino...@gmail.com> > > > escreveu: > > > > > > > Noticed this when trying to add more UTs for it in HBASE-28636. > > > > > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hashtable.synctable > > > > > > > > We do have a section in our ref guide to explain the algorythm for > > > > this tool and also how to make use of it. But I noticed that in our > > > > code base it is marked as IA.Private, and it is not exposed in our > map > > > > reduce Driver class. > > > > > > > > Is this intentional? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > >
