This all looks fine to me in principle. I say go for it. Thanks a lot Yurii.
-n On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm posting here Yurii's answer as it did not found this discuss thread: > > Hope this reaches the thread well. > > I updated the website and now it loads perfectly even with JS disabled in > the browser. Some features might not be working, e.g., the dropdown menus > in the navbar, but no-JS fallback can be added to them later. So it won't > work as good as with JS, but it will be fully functional. > > Check this out https://hbase-landing.vercel.app/ > > Thanks! > > Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. okt. 13., H, > 15:07): > > > I'm not at all opposed to JavaScript being present. My concern is that > the > > site still works for a browser that has JavaScript disabled. A pure > > JavaScript app is not acceptable to me. > > > > However it's implemented, if this new system can render static HTML (and > > everything else needed) at build time, that the essential assets are > > delivered without the need for JavaScript, then I have no objections. I > > welcome the improvement! > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 3:01 PM Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > However, it's all JavaScript, at least that's what is being served to > > my > > > > browser. Can it be generated as old fashioned html + css? > > > > > > > > > > > > It's all JavaScript, that's right, but all the code in the end is > > composed > > > into HTML + CSS + JS. Currently the html document looks empty, but we > can > > > render complete HTML in advance at build time. So we will have the HTML > > > document, and some CSS/JS assets, all can be served as static files. > Even > > > current version of the website uses some JS, but it's just not written > > > manually. Having a website without any JS nowadays is literally > > impossible > > > because any UI assumes interactivity. > > > > > > Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. okt. 13., > H, > > > 13:24): > > > > > > > I forgot to mention that this landing page uses Tailwind CSS and it > is > > > not > > > > based on Maven site plugin because using a Maven site skin we'd have > to > > > > override every piece of CSS. > > > > > > > > However, it's all JavaScript, at least that's what is being served to > > my > > > >> browser. Can it be generated as old fashioned html + css? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll check with Yurii on this. > > > > > > > > Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. okt. > 13., > > H, > > > > 12:29): > > > > > > > >> The look is really nice -- in line with our existing site, but a > more > > > >> modern look. > > > >> > > > >> However, it's all JavaScript, at least that's what is being served > to > > my > > > >> browser. Can it be generated as old fashioned html + css? > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 8:56 AM Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Team, > > > >> > > > > >> > Yurii Palamarchuk (my team-mate at dayjob) created a nice proposal > > for > > > >> the > > > >> > face-lift of the HBase website. > > > >> > You can check it out: https://hbase-landing.vercel.app/ > > > >> > > > > >> > It's one page currently. If the direction is good, he will finish > > all > > > of > > > >> > them. > > > >> > > > > >> > Please share your thoughts. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Dávid > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
