Re: [DISCUSS] Drop EOL hbase versions support in hbase-operator-tools 1.3.0

[Peter Somogyi]

Sounds good to me. Focusing on the newer HBase versions will simplify
development and maintenance.

Thanks,
Peter

On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 3:22 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:

> While adding the 3.0.0 support for hbase-operator-tools, we found that
> we still rely on some classes which are removed in 3.0.0, while the
> alternate classes are only present in 2.3.0+, like
> IncrementalLoadHFiles vs BulkLoadHFiles.
>
> For reducing the maintenance overhead, we prefer moving up to the new
> classes and drop the support for EOL hbase versions in
> hbase-operator-tools 1.3.0, while you can still use
> hbase-operator-tools 1.2.0 for these EOL hbase versions.
>
> Suggestions are welcome.
>
> Thanks.
>