+1 (non-binding)

I checked:
* Signature: OK
* Checksum : OK
* Rat check (1.8.0_421 and 17.0.12): OK
   - mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Build from source (1.8.0_421 and 17.0.12): OK
   - mvn clean install -DskipTests -t toolchains.xml
* Unit Tests (1.8.0_421 and 17.0.12): OK
   - mvn clean package -P release -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3 -t 
toolchains.xml

On 2026/03/10 18:55:56 "Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu" wrote:
> +1
> 
>         * Signature: ok
>         * Checksum : failed
>         * Rat check (8.0.452 & 17.0.17): ok
>          - mvn clean apache-rat:check
>         * Built from source (8.0.452 & 17.0.17): ok
>          - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
>         * Unit tests pass (8.0.452 & 17.0.17): ok
>          - mvn clean package -P runAllTests
>  -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3
> 
> -Stephen
> 
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 10:35 AM Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >         * Signature: ok
> >         * Checksum : failed
> >         * Rat check (17.0.11): ok
> >          - mvn clean apache-rat:check
> >         * Built from source (17.0.11): ok
> >          - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
> >         * Unit tests pass (17.0.11): ok
> >          - mvn clean package -P runAllTests
> >  -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3
> >
> > HBASE-29971 PR looks good to me.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pankaj
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 10:23 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >         * Signature: ok
> > >         * Checksum : failed
> > >         * Rat check (17.0.18): ok
> > >          - mvn clean apache-rat:check
> > >         * Built from source (17.0.18): ok
> > >          - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
> > >         * Unit tests pass (17.0.18): ok
> > >          - mvn package -P runAllTests
> > -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3
> > >
> > > The output of the vote script shows signature as failed but the actual
> > > status is
> > >
> > > gpg: Signature made Fri Mar  6 20:12:46 2026 PST
> > > gpg:                using RSA key
> > E54BBE3E97CFA48AAF7647E7AAC933D79AD2AE49
> > > gpg: Good signature from "Duo Zhang (Apache9) <[email protected]>"
> > > [unknown]
> > >
> > > Approved the PR for HBASE-29971.
> > >
> > > Once the thirdparty is released and the PR to consume it is merged we
> > will
> > > make another attempt at 2.5 and 2.6 release candidates.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 4:40 AM Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >         * Signature: ok
> > > >         * Checksum : failed
> > > >         * Rat check (25.0.2): ok
> > > >          - mvn clean apache-rat:check
> > > >         * Built from source (25.0.2): ok
> > > >          - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
> > > >         * Unit tests pass (25.0.2): ok
> > > >          - mvn clean package -P runAllTests
> > > >  -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 7:01 AM Nihal Jain <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > * Signature: OK
> > > > > * Checksum : OK
> > > > > * Rat check (1.8.0_292 and 17.0.16): OK
> > > > > - mvn clean apache-rat:check
> > > > > * Build from source (1.8.0_292 and 17.0.16): OK
> > > > >  - mvn clean install -DskipTests
> > > > > * Unit Tests (1.8.0_292 and 17.0.16): OK
> > > > > - mvn clean package  -P release -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, the draft PR in main repo for upgrading hbase-thirdparty to
> > > 4.1.13
> > > > > looks good to me!
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Nihal
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2026/03/09 01:50:54 Duo Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > +1 from me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the draft PR for upgrading hbase main repo to
> > > hbase-thirdparty
> > > > > > 4.1.13, which is good, the failed UTs are not related.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/7869
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And I also run a 10B ITBLL, although it failed at 9th round's
> > > > > > generator job, I did not see any data corruption problems since the
> > > > > > failure was memory pressure and too many full GCs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's finish this release and then make new hbase releases to
> > resolev
> > > > > > the security problems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Duo Zhang <[email protected]> 于2026年3月7日周六 17:48写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote on this Apache hbase thirdparty release candidate,
> > > > > > > hbase-thirdparty-4.1.13RC1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache hbase thirdparty 4.1.13
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 4.1.13RC1:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   https://github.com/apache/hbase-thirdparty/tree/4.1.13RC1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This tag currently points to git reference
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   c4d13cdfbe20cb9cc3b96ce6d567e7f8ac6c2421
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as
> > > CHANGES.md
> > > > > > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-thirdparty-4.1.13RC1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1597/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Artifacts were signed with the 0x9AD2AE49 key which can be found
> > > in:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   https://downloads.apache.org/hbase/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To learn more about Apache hbase thirdparty, please see
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   http://hbase.apache.org/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Your HBase Release Manager
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to