On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 19:06 +0100, Roland Weber wrote: > Roland Weber wrote: > > > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/doxia/references/apt-format.html > > I don't know what this reference documents, but certainly > not the format interpreted by the Maven on my machine. > The anchor/link mechanism is seriously broken, or at > least behaves completely different from how I interpret > the reference. > > {{anchor}} does not create a link to the "anchor" in the > same document, it creates a link to a different document > with name "anchor". There are no implicit anchors defined > for the section headers. And {anchor} will not define an > invisible anchor similar to <a name="anchor"></a>. Instead, > it generates <a name="anchor">anchor</a>, which leads to > an underscored text with our stylesheet. The links could > be hack-fixed as {{{#anchor}anchor}}. > > Maybe this can be rectified by upgrading some plugins, but > it is beyond my patience for this evening to investigate > that. For the time being, I can only recommend to not use > in-document links with APT. >
Roland, There is an option to use xdoc format for complex pages where APT may prove lacking or too constraining. Oleg > cheers, > Roland > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
