I agree with Odi. Using the javax.mail stuff is pretty awkward. The built-in MIME support inside HttpClient has been really convenient for a lot of people.
ps. to see what I mean by "javax.mail" being awkward, here's an example of parsing MIME, rather than creating MIME: http://markmail.org/message/wezfzjztshn75bwh pps. sometimes I wonder, though, why people don't do that instead of commons-upload....! yours, Julius On Jan 21, 2008 8:09 AM, Ortwin Glück <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > What should be our fallback option? Migrating old code to HttpClient 4 > > codeline? Dropping multipart support altogether? > > > > Thoughts? > > Having multipart MIME support *is* important. It's basically > indispensible if you are serious about HTTP. So I am for a migration. > > Odi > > -- > [web] http://www.odi.ch/ > [blog] http://www.odi.ch/weblog/ > [pgp] key 0x81CF3416 > finger print F2B1 B21F F056 D53E 5D79 A5AF 02BE 70F5 81CF 3416 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
